Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1989 10(12):1090-1100;
Copyright © 1989 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOURNIER, C.
Right arrow Articles by BLONDEAU, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FOURNIER, C.
Right arrow Articles by BLONDEAU, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1989 The European Society of Cardiology

Comparison of the efficacy of propranolol and amiodarone in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias following myocardial infarction

C. FOURNIER*,, M. BRUNET*, M. BAH{dagger}, M. KINDERMANS*, B. BOUJON*, P. TOURNADRE*, J.-F. GIUDICELLI{dagger} and M. BLONDEAU*

*Department of Cardiology, Hôopital de Bicêtre Paris, France
{dagger}Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hôopital de Bicêtre Paris, France

Received 3 January 1989; revised 10 April 1989; .

Address for correspondence: Dr Claude Fournier, Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicetre Cedex, Paris, France

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective randomized trial was to compare the efficacy of propranolol and amiodarone in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias during the first 6 months following myocardial infarction (MI). 97 patients were treated with either amiodarone (n=48) or propranolol (n=49) starting on the 9th day following MI. Holter monitoring was carried out on four occasions: on D7, D21, D90 and D180. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of ‘major’ arrhythmias (an average of at least 10 ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) h–1, multiform or paired VPCs or runs) between the two groups on D7. A significant difference in favour of amiodarone became apparent at D180 (P= 0.04). Patients were also classified according to whether treatment failed or was successful. ‘Success’ was recorded when arrhythmias remained minor or became minor (<10 uniform VPCsh–1) and ‘failure’ when arrhythmias remained major or became major, or when patients were withdrawn because of side-effects, or lost to follow-up. The difference remained in favour of amiodarone (P=0.03 at D21; P=0.05 at D90; P=0.06 at D180). Evaluation of the percentage reduction in the number of VPCs at D21, D90 or D180 compared with D7 sho >ed superiority of amiodarone at D90 (P<0.01) and D180 (P<0.04). In this study, the overall effect of amiodarone on ventricular arrhythmias following MI was shown to be superior to that of propranolol.

Key Words: Myocardial infarction • ventricular arrhythmias • antiarrhythmic drugs • long-term electrocardiographic monitoring • drug assays


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Kovoor, V. Eipper, K. Byth, M.J. Cooper, J.B. Uther, and D.L. Ross
Comparison of sotalol with amiodarone for long-term treatment of spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia based on coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 1999; 20(5): 364 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
I. Sim, K. M. McDonald, P. W. Lavori, C. M. Norbutas, and M. A. Hlatky
Quantitative Overview of Randomized Trials of Amiodarone to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2823 - 2829.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.