Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1990 11(5):399-402;
Copyright © 1990 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by IHLEN, H.
Right arrow Articles by MALSTAD, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by IHLEN, H.
Right arrow Articles by MALSTAD, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 The European Society of Cardiology

Cardiac output measured by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic prosthetic valves

H. IHLEN1 and P. MALSTAD

Medical Departmetn B, Rikshospitalet, National Hospital, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway

Received 19 May 1989; revised 17 August 1989; .

1Correspondence: Dr Halfdan Ihlen, Med. Dept B., Rikshospitalet, N-0027 Oslo I, Norway

Abstract

Quantification of blood flow is important for the correct interpretation of pressure gradients across prosthetic valves. Cardiac output was assessed simultaneously by Doppler echocardiography and the Fick oxygen method in 20 patients with aortic prosthetic valves. Velocity integral and diameter were measured in the outflow tract close to the valve at a site where the colour flow map showed no interference by valvular velocity. Doppler cardiac output was calculated by multiplying systolic velocity integral with area and heart rate. The variability of the haemodynamic parameters was tested in 10 additional patients. The non-invasive results correlated closely with the invasive results (r = 0.91, SEE 0.61 min–1). Analysis of variance showed that no bias was introduced when cardiac output was determined by two different observers and on different days. Coefficient of variation for velocity integral, outflow area, heart rate and cardiac output were 9.6%, 7.2%, 6% and 10.8%, respectively. In conclusion, Doppler echocardiography is useful for estimating cardiac output in patients with aortic prosthetic valves.

Key Words: Doppler echocardiography • Fick oxygen method • cardiac ouput • aortic prosthetic valve • reproducibility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
J R Gonzalez-Juanatey, M V Fernandez, F G Sampedro, J M Garcia-Acuna, J B Garcia-Bengoechea, A A Cendon, and M G de la Pena
Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots
Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 149 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey, J. M. Garca-Acuna, M. V. Fernandez, A. A. Cendon, V. C. Fuentes, J. B. Garcia-Bengoechea, and M. G. de la Pena
INFLUENCE OF THE SIZE OF AORTIC VALVE PROSTHESES ON HEMODYNAMICS AND CHANGE IN LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF AORTIC STENOSIS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1996; 112(2): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Birdi, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCES OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL AND CARBOMEDICS 21 MM AORTIC PROSTHESES BY MEANS OF DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1996; 111(2): 408 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Birdi, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Small CarboMedics Aortic Prostheses Using Dobutamine-Stress Doppler Echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1995; 60(4): 1048 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.