Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1991 12(1):60-64;
Copyright © 1991 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN DOES, R.D.
Right arrow Articles by ÜBERBACHER, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by VAN DOES, R.D.
Right arrow Articles by ÜBERBACHER, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 The European Society of Cardiology

Treatment of chronic stable angina with carvedilol in comparison with nifedipine s. r.

R.DER VAN DOES*,, R. EBERHARDT{dagger}, I. DERR{dagger}, B. EHMER*, J. RUDORF* and H. J. ÜBERBACHER*

*Department of Clinical Research, Boehringer Mannheim GmbH Mannheim
{dagger}Pharmalog Institute Munich, Germany

Received 18 September 1989; revised 22 March 1990; .

Address for correspondence: Dr Reinhard van der Does, Department of Clinical Research, Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Sandhofer Strasse 116, 6800 Mannheim 31, Germany.

Abstract

Carvedilol 25 mg b. d. was compared with nifedipine s. r. 20 mg b. d. for subchronic treatment of patients with chronic stable angina. After washout and placebo run-in, 163 patients were randomly and double-blindly allocated to one of the two treatment groups. Two symptom-limited seated bicycle exercise tests were performed on placebo in order to confirm stable baseline conditions. After 4 weeks of active treatment, a further exercise test was performed in the morning, 12 h after the preceding dose. Diary cards were kept by the patients throughout the trial in order to record angina attacks and glyceryl trinitrate consumption.

Carvedilol seemed to be somewhat more effective than nifedipine s. r. for improving exercise tolerance and exercise time to onset of angina and 1 mm ST-segment depression. Although there were highly statistically significant differences vs placebo, the two treatment groups did not differ significantly. No difference between treatment with carvedilol and nifedipine s. r. was found regarding angina symptoms and glyceryl trinitrate consumption during daily life. Adverse events were less frequently reported in the carvedilol group than in the nifedipine group. Generally, however, both agents were well tolerated. Carvedilol therapy for chronic stable agina seems to be both efficacious and safe.

Key Words: Carvedilol • nifedipine s. r. • exercise testing • chronic stable angina


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. A Karle, V. A.W Kreye, D. Thomas, K. Rockl, S. Kathofer, W. Zhang, and J. Kiehn
Antiarrhythmic drug carvedilol inhibits HERG potassium channels
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2001; 49(2): 361 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. B. Stason, C. H. Schmid, D. Niedzwiecki, G. W. Whiting, J.-F. Caubet, D. Cory, D. Luo, S. D. Ross, and T. C. Chalmers
Safety of Nifedipine in Angina Pectoris : A Meta-Analysis
Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 24 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. H. Frishman
Carvedilol
N. Engl. J. Med., December 10, 1998; 339(24): 1759 - 1765.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
W. H. Schaefer, J. Politowski, B. Hwang, F. Dixon Jr., A. Goalwin, L. Gutzait, K. Anderson, C. DeBrosse, M. Bean, and G. R. Rhodes
Metabolism of Carvedilol in Dogs, Rats, and Mice
Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 1998; 26(10): 958 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
North of England Stable Angina Guideline Developme
North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina
BMJ, March 30, 1996; 312(7034): 827 - 832.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.