Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1991 12(10):1089-1097;
Copyright © 1991 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BASTOS, P.
Right arrow Articles by GOMES, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BASTOS, P.
Right arrow Articles by GOMES, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 The European Society of Cardiology

Left ventricular function after total correction of tetralogy of Fallot

P. BASTOS, J. CAMPOS*, D. CUNHA{dagger} and M. GOMES

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Oporto School of Medicine Oporto, Portugal
*Department of Cardiology Oporto School of Medicine Oporto, Portugal
{dagger}Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Oporto School of Medicine Oporto, Portugal

Received 22 August 1990; revised 30 October 1990; .

Correspondence: Pedro Bastos MD, Centro de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital de S Joao. 4200 Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Conflicting data are available concerning left ventricular (LV) function in patients after total correction of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). The response to afterload stress determined by methoxamine challenge and the peak systolic blood pressure-end-systolic volume relationship were evaluated echocardiographically in 20 postoperative TOF patients (age range 9 to 15 years, mean 12±2). All patients were without significant residual shunts or pulmonary stenosis. Results were compared with those in 10 control subjects (age range 9 to 15 years, mean 11±2). The TOF group had higher mean end- diastolic (76·9±14·4 vs 66·2±7·2 ml. m P<0·05) and mean end-systolic (36·7±8 vs 29·6±3·9 ml. m–2 P<0·05 volumes than controls. Stroke volume index (SVI) and LV ejection fraction were similar in the two groups. In normal subjects, mnethoxamine caused a decrease in SVI in seven Out of 10 patients and a mild increase in three; the mean value of SVI at rest was not significantly different from the mean value at peak pressor effect (36·5±4·4 vs 35·9±4·0 ml. m–2, P=NS). In the TOF group, methoxamine induceda reduction in SVI in all patients, the mean value of SVl at peak pressor effect was significantly lower than the mean value at rest (31·3±5·4 vs 40·2±6·9 ml. m–2 P<0·001). Ejection fraction decreased in both groups with the afterload challenge, but in the TOF patients the reduction was significantly higher than in the normal subjects (from 53±4 to 38±5% vs from 55±3 to 49±3%, P<0·001). Peak systolic blood pressure-end- systolic volume relationships were constructed. The slope (m) of the relationship was significantly lower in the TOF group than in the control subjects (2·85±0·77 vs 6·21+0·58, p<0·001);in the TOE group m was below the 95% confidence limit in all studied patients. There was a significant correlation between aortic oxygen saturation preoperatively and the slope of the peak systolic pressure-end-systolic volume relation. Thus, LV function after successful total correction of TOFmay be abnormal, with larger than normal LV size and decreased contractile function.

Key Words: Tetralogy of Fallot • left ventricular contractility • end-systolic indexes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Jonsson, T. Ivert, R. Jonasson, A. Holmgren, and V. O. Bjork
WORK CAPACITY AND CENTRAL HEMODYNAMICS THIRTEEN TO TWENTY-SIX YEARS AFTER REPAIR OF TETRALOGY OF FALLOT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1995; 110(2): 416 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.