Copyright © 1991 by the European Society of Cardiology.
© 1991 The European Society of Cardiology
ST-segment analysis: a useful marker for reperfusion after thrombolysis with APS AC?
*Department of Intensive Care, University Antwerp VIA, Belgium
accepted 30 April 1990.
Correspondence: Prof. L. Bossert, Dept. of Intensive Care, University Antwerp, UIA, B2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
The European Multicentre Study (EMS) assessed coronary reperfusion, functional outcome and safety of anistreplase (anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex = APSAC
) compared to a control group treated with heparin alone in patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (A Ml). In the Belgian subset of data (n = 103) the reperfusion results, based on non-invasive clinical parameters, were significantly better in the APSAC group: 66% versus 18% in the heparin group (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups with respect to left ventricular function and adverse events.
The purpose of the present study was to analyse the indicative value of ST-segment changes as a possible predictor of reperfusion in threatened myocardial tissue. Two scoring systems were used: the first was based on the combined evaluation of three clinical non-invasive parameters (course of chest pain, ECG evaluation of ST segment changes, reperfusion arrhythmias); the second was based on the changes of the sum of the ST-segment (
-ST) elevations on consecutive 12-lead ECGs. There was a good correlation between the combined clinical scoring system and the residual stenosis on coronary angiography (P<0–05) and early CK peak (P<0.0001). Analysis of the ECG data revealed that a decrease of 
50% of the sum of ST-elevations (-ST) at 2 h post-treatment in both limb and precordial leads is a fairly useful predictor of reperfusion (sensitivity= 73%, specificity = 63%, predictive value = 88%).
Key Words: APSAC • thrombolysis • ECG analysis • reperfusion
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Johanson, T. Jernberg, G. Gunnarsson, B. Lindahl, L. Wallentin, and M. Dellborg Prognostic value of ST-segment resolution--when and what to measure Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2003; 24(4): 337 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Achenbach, D Ropers, M Regenfus, G Muschiol, W G Daniel, and W Moshage Contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography to analyse the coronary arteries in patients after acute myocardial infarction Heart, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 489 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Matetzky, D. Freimark, P. Chouraqui, I. Novikov, O. Agranat, B. Rabinowitz, E. Kaplinsky, and H. Hod The distinction between coronary and myocardial reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy by clinical markers of reperfusion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1326 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Stubbs, P. Collinson, D. Moseley, T. Greenwood, and M. Noble Prognostic Significance of Admission Troponin T Concentrations in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Circulation, September 15, 1996; 94(6): 1291 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|