Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1992 13(2):223-231;
Copyright © 1992 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TUCCILLO, B.
Right arrow Articles by SUTHERLAND, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TUCCILLO, B.
Right arrow Articles by SUTHERLAND, G. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 The European Society of Cardiology

Transoesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of atrial morphology in children with congenital heart disease

B. TUCCILLO*, O. STÜMPER, J. HESS, R. J. VAN SUIJLEN, E. BOS, J. R. T. C. ROELANDT and G. R. SUTHERLAND

University Hospital Ronerdam, Sophia Children's Hospital, Thoraxcentre and Department of Pathology. Erasmus University, Rotterdam The Netherlands

Received 20 November 1990; revised 1 February 1991; .

Correspondence: Oliver Stümper, Department of Paediatnc Cardiology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Sciennes Road, Edinburgh EH9 ILF, U.K.

Abstract

In a prospective study, atrial morphology was evaluated by both transoesophageal and precordial echocardiography in 86 unoperated children with congenital heart disease (age range = 0.2 to 14.8 years, mean = 3.8 years) to determine what advantages, if any, might be inherent in the transoesophageal approach. The information derived from both ultrasound approaches was correlated and compared to information obtained during subsequent cardiac catheterization (78patients) and, or, surgical inspection (53 patients). A trial appendage morphology and hence atrial sit us was determined by transoesophageal echocardiography in every case (82 solitus, two right atrial isomerism, two left atrial isomerism). In addition, the transoesophageal approach indicated left juxtaposition in four patients, compared to only one by precordial examination. Probe patency of the foramen ovale was correctly predicted in 21 patients by transoesophageal imaging, but in only 10 by precordial imaging. In two children significant secundum defects, undetected by the precordial route, were identified. Multiple atrial septal defects were correctly defined infour patients by transoesophagealstudy but in only one by precordial study. Sinus venosus defects were documented in four by the transoesophageal approach, but in only one by the precordial. Primum defects were equally well documented (nine patients) by either technique, but the associated valve leaflet morphology was better documented by transoesophageal study in 5/9. A subtotal cor triatriatum was diagnosed in one child only by transoesophageal investigation.

Transoesophageal echocardiography allows a much more detailed evaluation of atrial morphology than precordial imaging even in infants. It provides direct diagnosis of atrial situs, detection ofjuxtaposed atrial appendages and improved demonstration or definitive exclusion of atrial septal defects.

Key Words: Echocardiography • heart disease • congenital • septal defects • atrial situs


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. P. Veinot, P. J. Harrity, F. Gentile, B. K. Khandheria, K. R. Bailey, J. T. Eickholt, J. B. Seward, A. J. Tajik, and W. D. Edwards
Anatomy of the Normal Left Atrial Appendage : A Quantitative Study of Age-Related Changes in 500 Autopsy Hearts: Implications for Echocardiographic Examination
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 3112 - 3115.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.