Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1992 13(4):526-530;
Copyright © 1992 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LAZZERONI, E.
Right arrow Articles by BOTTI, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LAZZERONI, E.
Right arrow Articles by BOTTI, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 The European Society of Cardiology

Efficacy and tolerability of gallopamil in coronary heart disease: a double blind cross-over comparison with nifedipine

E. LAZZERONI, L. MOROZZI, M. CAMPANA and G. BOTTI

Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Regionale Parma, Italy

Received 19 November 1990; revised 22 May 1991; .

Correspondence Ettore Lazzeroni, Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Regionale, Via Gramsci 14,43100 Parma, Italy

Abstract

Anti-ischaemic properties and tolerability of the calcium antagonist gallopamil were compared with those of nifedipine in a double-blind cross-over study performed in 20 patients affected by effort or mixed angina. The patients were of both sexes and aged 43-66 years; coronary angiography performed on 18 of them revealed at least one-vessel disease (stenosis > 70%). After a one week wash-out period the patients received placebo for 2 weeks; thereafter 10 patients were treated orally with gallopamil 150 mg daily and 10 patients with nifedipine 60 mg daily for 4 weeks. Before crossing-over to the alternate therapy a 2-week placebo period was allowed.

The patients underwent cycloergometric exercise tests after each phase of treatment; workload was increased by 25 W every 3 min and the test was stopped in the presence of a typical angina or ST segment depression or age-predicted maximal heart rate.

The results show that both exercise time and maximal workload were significantly increased by gallopamil and by nifedipine in comparison with placebo; also the maximal ST segment depression was significantly reduced by the two drugs.

The number of patients developing angina and/or segment depression during exercise test was significantly reduced by both drugs compared to placebo. Time to onset of angina and time to ST depression ≥ 1 mm were increased, though not significantly, by both calcium antagonists.

No side effects were recorded with gallopamil while with nifedipine six patients reported side effects. In conclusion, this cross-over study shows that gallopamil 150 mg daily has an anti-anginal efficacy comparable to that of nifedipine at high doses (60 mg daily), and as opposed to nifedipine, gallopamil is better tolerated. Gallopamil appears to be an effective and safe calcium-antagonist for the treatment of effort or mixed angina.

Key Words: Gallopamil • nifedipine • calcium-antagonists • angina pectoris


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. B. Stason, C. H. Schmid, D. Niedzwiecki, G. W. Whiting, J.-F. Caubet, D. Cory, D. Luo, S. D. Ross, and T. C. Chalmers
Safety of Nifedipine in Angina Pectoris : A Meta-Analysis
Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 24 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.