Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1992 13(5):608-615;
Copyright © 1992 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DICKEY, W.
Right arrow Articles by ADGEY, A. A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DICKEY, W.
Right arrow Articles by ADGEY, A. A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 The European Society of Cardiology

The accuracy of decision-making of a semi-automatic defibrillator during cardiac arrest

W. DICKEY, G. W. N. DALZELL, J. MCC. ANDERSON* and A. A. J. ADGEY

Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast BT12 6BA, N. Ireland
*Department of Bioengineering, University of Ulster Jordanstown, N. Ireland

Received 4 January 1991; revised 22 May 1991; .

Correspondence: Dr A. A. J. Adgey, Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, N. Ireland.

Abstract

The accuracy of decision-making of a semi-automatic defibrillator was assessed at 57 cardiac arrests in 55 patients. The initial rhythm was ventricular fibrillation at 40 arrests and was correctly identified in 37 (sensitivity 92.5%). In theother 17 arrests initial rhythms were not ventricular fibrillation and 16 were correctly identified (specificity 94%). Continuous electrocardiographic recordings of the arrests were analysed in 8–12 s segments: of 432 segments showing ventricular fibrillation, 352 were correctly identified (sensitivity 81%); 3895 of 4139 segments showing rhythms other than ventricular fibrillation were correctly identified (specificity 94%). The percentage accuracy of detection of ventricular fibrillation varied from 0–100% (mean 91%) and for non-ventricular fibrillation from 51–100% (mean 92%). When 104 segments of ventricular fibrillation and 470 segments of non-ventricular fibrillation with cardiopulmonary resuscitation artefact were excluded from the analysis, a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 96% were obtained. Thus the detection of cardiac arrest rhythms using a microprocessor based detection system for patients with cardiac arrest has a high sensitivity for ventricular fibrillation and specificity for non-ventricular fibrillation.

Key Words: Semi-automatic defibrillator • ventricular fibrillation • non-ventricular fibrillation • cardiac arrests


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
W. H Ibrahim
Recent advances and controversies in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Postgrad. Med. J., October 1, 2007; 83(984): 649 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 5: Electrical Therapies: Automated External Defibrillators, Defibrillation, Cardioversion, and Pacing
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-35 - IV-46.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Cecchin, D. B. Jorgenson, C. I. Berul, J. C. Perry, A. A. Zimmerman, B. W. Duncan, F. M. Lupinetti, D. Snyder, T. D. Lyster, G. L. Rosenthal, et al.
Is Arrhythmia Detection by Automatic External Defibrillator Accurate for Children? : Sensitivity and Specificity of an Automatic External Defibrillator Algorithm in 696 Pediatric Arrhythmias
Circulation, May 22, 2001; 103(20): 2483 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.