Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1993 14(10):1369-1374;
Copyright © 1993 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOALE, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FOALE, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 The Europen Society of Cardiology

Atenolol versus the fixed combination of atenolol and nifedipine in stable angina pectoris

R. A. FOALE

Department of Cardiology, St Mary's Hospital London

Received 28 March 1991; revised 8 April 1993; .

Correspondence: R. A. Foale, Consultant Cardiologist, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, Paddington, London.

Abstract

One hundred and fourteen patients (94 male) with chronic stable angina who had a positive exercise test after 4 weeks on atenolol alone were randomized to receive either atenolol alone or the fixed combination of atenolol and nifedipine slow release formulation for 4 weeks in a double-blind cross-over manner. Exercise stress testing (Bruce protocol) at the end of each treatment period demonstrated that the time to the onset of pain and occurrence of 1 mm ST segment depression improved significantly (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001 respectively) whilst on the fixed combination compared to atenolol alone. In order to achieve sufficient sensitivity in the analysis of the exercise times, novel statistical methods based on survival analysis were used. Maximum ST segment depression was 0.13 mm less (p < 0.04) while on the fixed combination. The incidence of withdrawals and adverse effects was similar on both treatments.

Key Words: Atenolol • fixed combination • nifedipine • stable angina pectoris


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Task Force Members, J. Lopez-Sendo, K. Swedberg, J. McMurray, J. Tamargo, A. P. Maggioni, H. Dargie, M. Tendera, F. Waagstein, J. Kjekshus, et al.
Expert consensus document on {beta}-adrenergic receptor blockers: The Task Force on Beta-Blockers of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1341 - 1362.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. D. Fihn, S. V. Williams, J. Daley, and R. J. Gibbons
Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina: Treatment
Ann Intern Med, October 16, 2001; 135(8_Part_1): 616 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. Eccles, N. Rousseau, P. Adams, and L. Thomas
Evidence-based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2001; 18(2): 217 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley, J. S. Douglas, S. D. Fihn, J. M. Gardin, M. A. Grunwald, D. Levy, B. W. Lytle, R. A. O'Rourke, et al.
ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 2092 - 2197.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. B. Stason, C. H. Schmid, D. Niedzwiecki, G. W. Whiting, J.-F. Caubet, D. Cory, D. Luo, S. D. Ross, and T. C. Chalmers
Safety of Nifedipine in Angina Pectoris : A Meta-Analysis
Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 24 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
North of England Stable Angina Guideline Developme
North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina
BMJ, March 30, 1996; 312(7034): 827 - 832.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.