Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1993 14(10):1421-1426;
Copyright © 1993 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SANCHIS, J.
Right arrow Articles by LÓPEZ MERINO, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SANCHIS, J.
Right arrow Articles by LÓPEZ MERINO, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 The Europen Society of Cardiology

Effect of site, summation and asynchronism of inputs on atrioventricular nodal conduction and refractoriness

J. SANCHIS, F. J. CHORRO, L. SUCH*, J. MATAMOROS*, J. V. MONMENEU*, J. CORTINA and V. LÓPEZ MERINO

Servei de Cardiologia i Valencia, Spain
*Departament de Fisiologia, Hospital Clinic i Universitari Valencia, Spain

accepted 15 June 1993.

Correspondence: Dr Juan Sanchis, Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Blasco Ibáñez 17, Valencia-46010, Spain.

Abstract

The impulses coming from the sinus node synchronically penetrate the A V node via the crista terminalis and inter-atrial septum. Studies in superfused rabbit AV preparations suggest that the crista terminalis is a more effective input than the inter-atrial septum, and that the summation of both inputs facilitates AV nodal conduction. The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis in a more physiological model, such as the whole rabbit heart perfused by a Langendorff system.

Fifteen rabbit hearts were studied in a Langendorff perfusion system with six bipolar extracellular electrodes: two for stimulating (crista terminalis and inter-atrial septum) and four for recording (crista terminalis, inter-atrial septum, His bundle electrogram and right ventricle). Seven hearts (Group I) were consecutively paced at the crista terminalis, inter-atrial septum and both sites simultaneously, to determine the AV nodal Wenckebach cycle length and effective refractory period under basal conditions and after acetylcholine (0.75 x 10–6 M). In eight hearts under 0.75 x 10–6 M acetylcholine (Group II), the crista terminalis and inter-atrial septum were simultaneously (delay = 0 ms) or sequentially (delay = 2,4, 6,8,10,12,14,and 16 ms) stimulated to calculate the AV nodal effective refractory period and the AH interval at an atrial coupling interval 5 ms longer than the AV nodal effective refractory period, for each delay tested.

There were no basal differences in AV nodal parameters during crista terminalis pacing, inter-atrial septum pacing or simultaneous stimulation in both sites in Group I; after acetylcholine, the AV nodal Wenckebach cycle length and effective refractory period tended to be shorter during crista terminalis pacing (crista terminalis = 188 ±33 and 147±34; inter-atrial septum = 195±35 and 158±35; both sites = 195±34 and 154±36; values expressed in cycle length of pacing-ms), although the differences did not reach statistical significance. In Group II, the AH interval tended to prolong slightly on increasing the delay between crista terminalis and inter-atrial septum stimulation (delay 0 = 119±31, 2 = 125±29, 4 = 129±33,6 = 129±29,8 = 128±30,10 = 134±34,12 = 132±35,14 = 129±32,and 16 = 131 ±31 ms),but again the differences did not reach statistical significance; the A V nodal effective refractory period did not change when the delay was varied.

Conclusions: (1) Neither the input site nor the synchronous summation of inputs plays an important role in A V nodal conduction. (2) These results suggest that A Vnodal response during atrial tachyarrythymias depends more on atrial rate than on shiftings in site and time coupling of inputs.

Key Words: AV node • atrioventricular conduction • atrial conduction • crista terminalis • interatrial septum


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. Such, A. Rodriguez, A. Alberola, L. Lopez, R. Ruiz, L. Artal, I. Pons, M. L. Pons, C. Garcia, and F. J. Chorro
Intrinsic changes on automatism, conduction, and refractoriness by exercise in isolated rabbit heart
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2002; 92(1): 225 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. C Rankin and A. J Workman
Rate control in atrial fibrillation: role of atrial inputs to the AV node
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 249 - 251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Medkour, A. E. Becker, K. Khalife, and J. Billette
Anatomic and Functional Characteristics of a Slow Posterior AV Nodal Pathway : Role in Dual-Pathway Physiology and Reentry
Circulation, July 14, 1998; 98(2): 164 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Amellal and J. Billette
Selective Functional Properties of Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Inputs: Role in Nodal Conduction, Refractoriness, Summation, and Rate-Dependent Function in Rabbit Heart
Circulation, August 15, 1996; 94(4): 824 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.