Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1993 14(12):1683-1691;
Copyright © 1993 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OLIVA, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by EDWARDS, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by OLIVA, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by EDWARDS, W. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 The Europen Society of Cardiology

The electrocardiographic diagnosis of regional pericarditis in acute inferior myocardial infarction

P. B. OLIVA*,, S. C. HAMMILL{dagger} and W. D. EDWARDS{ddagger}

*Rose Medical Center Denver, CO, U.S.A.
{dagger}Electrocardiographic and Electrophysiologic Laboratories, Division of Cardiology Rochester, MN, U.S.A.
{ddagger}Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester, MN, U.S.A.

Received 5 March 1993; revised 24 June 1993; .

Correspondence: Philip B, Oliva, MD, Cardiology Division, Rose Medical Center, 4567 E. Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80220, U.S.A.

Abstract

The diagnosis of postinfarction localized (regional) pericarditis has remained elusive. During the course of a recent study of patients with fatal free-wall rupture, an atypical pattern of T-wave evolution was observed during the days preceding death. It was learned, from autopsy examination, that these electrocardiographic changes were due to the associated localized pericarditis, rather than the rupture, per se. Therefore, this investigation was undertaken to ascertain if the same atypical T-wave changes occur in patients with postinfarction localized pericarditis, but without free-wall rupture, and to determine if the frequency of those changes differs between those patients with inferior and those with anterior postinfarction pericarditis.

Forty-three patients with regional postinfarction pericarditis were identified clinically. They were divided into three groups, anterior (17), inferior (17) and lateral or posterior (9) myocardial infarction. In this report those patients with anterior regional postinfarction pericarditis are compared with those with inferior postinfarction pericarditis. It was found that an atypical T-wave evolution pattern — either persistently positive T-waves after 48 h or reversal of initially inverted T-waves after 48 h — existed in every patient irrespective of infarct location.

However, the two atypical patterns of T-wave evolution occurred with distinctly different frequencies between the two sites of infarction. With inferior post infarction pericarditis, gradual reversal of initially inverted T-waves occurred in 14 patients (82%) while only three (18%) had persistently positive T-waves. Conversely, among patients with anterior postinfarction pericarditis, reversal after inversion occurred in five of 17 patients (29%) while 12 of 17 patients (71%) had persistently positive deflections (P<0.01).

The only other processes observed which affected the T-wave evolution in a similar manner were patients who had had cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed and four patients with very small, initial infarcts who had rapid reversal of initially inverted T-waves due to the very early administration of lytic therapy. Therefore, atypical postinfarction T-wave evolution is a very sensitive (100%) and reasonably specific (77%) sign of postinfarction regional pericarditis.

Key Words: Postinfarction pericarditis • persistently positive T-waves • reversal of initially inverted T-waves


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.