Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1993 14(2):213-218;
Copyright © 1993 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROIG, E.
Right arrow Articles by SANZ, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ROIG, E.
Right arrow Articles by SANZ, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 The European Society of Cardiology

Prognostic value of exercise radionucide angiography in low risk acute myocardial infarction survivors

E. ROIG, J. MAGRIÑÁ, A. GARCIA*, X. ARMENGOL, A. MUXI*, G. MELIS and G. SANZ

Cardiology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Spain
*Nuclear Departments, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Spain

Received 13 December 1991; revised 21 August 1992; .

Correspondence: Dr Eulalia Roig, Cardiology Section, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Patients with an uneventful course during hospital stay, which represent from 30 to 50% of all myocardial infarction survivors, still have an incidence of new coronary events up to 7% during the first year of follow-up. To assess the value of radionuclide angiography in predicting new coronary events in this low risk population, 93 patients without evidence of left ventricular failure or recurrent postinfarction angina underwent rest and exercise radionuclide angiography and treadmill exercise testing before hospital discharge.

During follow-up (16 ± 5 months, range 12 to 32) 14 patients developed new coronary events: two patients died, four had a new myocardial infarction and the remaining eight had unstable angina. There were no differences regarding clinical variables, the results of the exercise test and the resting ejection fraction, between patients with or without new coronary events; however, patients without events during follow-up exercised longer during both exercise treadmill test and exercise radionuclide angiography. Resting end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes were higher in patients presenting coronary events (122 ± 50 vs 92 ± 32 ml. m–1 P <0.05, 69 ± 47 vs 47 ± 26 ml. m–2, P <0.05). These patients also had a higher incidence of wall motion abnormalities in more than one area (64 vs 28%, P <0.02). During exercise, ejection fraction increased significantly in patients with an uneventful outcome (49 ± 13 to 56 ± 14%, P <0.01), while it did not change in their counterparts (46 ± 14 to 45 ± 14%, NS). Thus, the proportion of patients in whom the ejection fraction decreased > 5% during exercise was higher among patients developing new coronary events during follow-up (43 vs 10%, P < 0.01). There were no differences regarding exercise ventricular volumes.

Multivariate analysis, using data from the clinical course and resting radionuclide angiography, identified presence of extensive (> one area) regional wall motion abnormalities (P <0.01) and end-diastolic volume index (P <0.03) as independent predictors of prognosis. When data from exercise testing and exercise radionuclide angiography were added, a decrease in exercise ejection fraction > 5% (P < 0.005) and end-systolic volume index at rest (P <005) were identified as predictors of new coronary events. Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of each regression equation, using ROC curves, also indicated that exercise radionuclide angiography added information to rest variables.

In conclusion, rest and exercise radionuclide angiography are helpful in evaluating the prognosis in patients with an uneventful course after myocardial infarction. In this low risk group, exercise radionuclide angiography showed better prognostic value than the exercise test.

Key Words: Low risk myocardial infarction survivors • radionuclide angiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Writing Committee Members, E. M. Antman, D. T. Anbe, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, M. Hand, J. S. Hochman, H. M. Krumholz, F. G. Kushner, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-Elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 671 - 719.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. M. Antman, D. T. Anbe, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, M. Hand, J. S. Hochman, H. M. Krumholz, F. G. Kushner, G. A. Lamas, et al.
ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)
Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): 588 - 636.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
F. Lopez-Jimenez, T. Y. Goraya, J. P. Hellermann, S. J. Jacobsen, G. S. Reeder, S. A. Weston, and V. L. Roger
Measurement of Ejection Fraction After Myocardial Infarction in the Population
Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 397 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.