Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1993 14(4):441-446;
Copyright © 1993 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JONSBU, J.
Right arrow Articles by ERIKSSEN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JONSBU, J.
Right arrow Articles by ERIKSSEN, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 The European Society of Cardiology

Prospective evaluation of an EDB-based diagnostic program to be used in patients admitted to hospital with acute chest pain

J. JONSBU, O. AASE, A. ROLLAG, K. LIESTØL* and J. ERIKSSEN

Medical Department, Central Hospital of Akershus 1474 Nordbyhagen
*Department of Informatics, University of Oslo 0316 Oslo, Norway

Received 18 May 1992; revised 21 September 1992; .

Correspondence: Jørgen Jonsbu, MD, Medical Department, Central Hospital of Akershus, N-Nordbyhagen, Norway

Abstract

A recently designed computer based decision support system (DSP), almost exclusively based on case history data, was developed to facilitate immediate differentiation between patients with and without urgent need for coronary care unit (CCU) transferral from the emergency room, and additionally to distinguish between patients with and without acute myocardial infarction (MI).

One-year's prospective testing in a consecutive series of 1252 patients with acute chest pain revealed that the DSP, used in addition to ECG and clinical examination, demonstrated a sensitivity of 96% in the detection of patients in need of CCU observation (MI-sensitivity of 98%), and a specificity of 56% in excluding patients who were not in need of CCU observation. The proportion of referrals to the CCU judged to be unnecessary was only 17% of the total number of patients seen in the emergency room.

Key Words: Acute chest pain • acute coronary disease • case history • decision support system • coronary care units


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
M A Graber and D VanScoy
How well does decision support software perform in the emergency department?
Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2003; 20(5): 426 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Ellenius, T. Groth, B. Lindahl, and L. Wallentin
Early assessment of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction by biochemical monitoring and neural network analysis
Clin. Chem., October 1, 1997; 43(10): 1919 - 1925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.