Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1993 14(8):1056-1064;
Copyright © 1993 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BARLETTA, G.
Right arrow Articles by BARONI, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BARLETTA, G.
Right arrow Articles by BARONI, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 The Europen Society of Cardiology

Effects of positive inotropic stimulation (post-extrasystolic potentiation) on non-uniformity of left ventricular contraction in patients with coronary artery disease

G. BARLETTA*,, M. DI DONATO*, F. FANTINI* and M. BARONI{dagger}

*Institute of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Unit Italy
{dagger}Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Florence Italy

Received 2 November 1992; revised 10 March 1993; .

Correspondence Dott. Giuseppe Barletta, U.O Malattie Cardiovascolari dell'Universita’, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134 Florence, Italy

Abstract

In patients with chronic coronary artery disease, post-extrasystolic potentiation (PESP) slightly worsens relaxation, increasing the constant {tau} of ventricular pressure decay. However, it does not negatively influence left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling. To our knowledge, no data are available on the effects of PESP on segmental relaxation in chronic coronary artery disease.

The effects of PESP on the LV pressure–volume (P/V) relationship and on segmental pressure–length loops (P/L) were studied in eight patients with coronary artery disease submitted to LV angiography.

P/V loops were constructed by means of frame-to-frame analysis of ventriculograms and simultaneous high-fidelity LV pressure tracings; P/L loops were calculated by the endocardial movement of 45 chords intersecting the LV outline (centreline method). PESP was produced by programmed stimulation during ventriculography. P/V and P/L loops were studied in basal conditions and after PESP.

Results showed enhanced LV pump function (ejection fraction from 0.45 ± 0.14 to 0.54 ± 0.13, P<0.01; LV stroke work index from 62±29 to 79±28 g. m–1.m–2, P<0.01; the LV end-systolic pressure–volume relation from 2.9±1 to 3.2±2 mmHg.ml–1, P<0.05) associated with impaired relaxation (time constant {tau}w, from 40±9 to 48±8 ms, P<0.01; time constant {tau}m from 53±11 to 61±10 ms, P<0.05;peak filling rate from 3.7 ± 1 to 2.3 ± 1 EDV.s–1, P<0.01; minimal diastolic pressure from 6±6 to 7.5±6 mmHg, P<0.05) and with increased preload (EDVI from 97±27 to 106±27 ml.m–2, P<0.01; LVEDP from 16 ± 9 to 19 ± 7 mmHg, P<0.01). P/L loops showed increased non-unformity of LV relaxation after PESP. The effects were more evident in the segments showing P/L loops inclined to the left, where PESP increased or caused the appearance of post-systolic shortening. PESP showed only slight or no effect in the segments showing P/L loops inclined towards the right.

PESP slightly impaired early left ventricular filling by decreasing the rate of fall of intraventricular pressure and increasing the non-unformity of contraction and relaxation. However, it did not change the isovolumic phases of pressure–length loops of normal segments, while worsened relaxation of hypokinetic (probably ischaemic) segments with the appearance of post-systolic shortening in the loops inclined to the left.

Key Words: Left ventricular function • relaxation • post-extrasystolic potentiation • pressure–length loop


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.