Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1993 14(Supplement H):78-84; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/14.suppl_H.78
Copyright © 1993 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klein, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 The European Society of Cardiology

Comparative efficacy of sotalol and class I antiarrhythmic agents in patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation: Results of the Electrophysiology Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Trial

Richard C. Klein and The Esvem Investigators*

University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City Utah, U.S.A.

Correspondence: Richard C. Klein, MD, Cardiology Division, University of Utah Medical Center, 50 N Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT84132, U.S.A.

The ESVEM Trial was a randomized prospective study to compare the predictive accuracy of electrophysiologic testing (EPS) to ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (Hotter monitoring—HM) for long-term drug therapy of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. 486 patients with documented ventricular tachycardia or resuscitated sudden death were randomized to EPS (n = 242) or HM (n = 244) and underwent serial drug testing with up to six antiarrhythmics; in the EPS limb a drug efficacy prediction was achieved in 108 patients (45%), comparted to 188 (77%) in the HM limb (P < 0.001). Efficacy predictions were most frequent with sotalol therapy. During long-term follow-up of the 296 patients discharged on a drug predicted to be effective, there were 151 recurrrences of an arrhythmic event; there were no differences in actuarial rates of arrhythmia recurrence between EPS and HM. With multivariate testing of 14 variables, only sotalol therapy and absence of prior antiarrhythmic therapy were associated with a significant reduction in risk of arrhythmia recurrence.

Key Words: Ventricular tachycardia • antiarrhythmic therapy • electrophysiologic testing vs ECG monitoring


* See Appendix for list of investigators.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Sheikh, G. E. Rainger, Z. Gale, M. Rahman, and G. B. Nash
Exposure to fluid shear stress modulates the ability of endothelial cells to recruit neutrophils in response to tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}: a basis for local variations in vascular sensitivity to inflammation
Blood, October 15, 2003; 102(8): 2828 - 2834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Dorian and D. Newman
Rate dependence of the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs delaying cardiac repolarization: an overview
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(4): 277 - 285.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
B. N. Singh
Review : Sotalol: Current Status and Expanding Indications
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(1): 49 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.