Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1994 15(11):1445-1455;
Copyright © 1994 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LAU, C.-P.
Right arrow Articles by CHUNG, F. L.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LAU, C.-P.
Right arrow Articles by CHUNG, F. L.-W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 The European Society of Cardiology

Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life

C.-P. LAU, Y.-T. TAI, W.-H. LEUNG, C.-K. WONG, P. LEE* and F. L.-W. CHUNG

Division of Cardiology, Departments of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong
*Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong

Received 5 April 1994; revised 13 June 1994; .

Correspondence: Dr C.P. Lau, Reader in Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

Abstract

An atrial-based pacing mode is superior to ventricular constant rate demand pacing (VVI) mode in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) by providing both rate adaptation and atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. The use of a non-atrial sensor to overcome chronotropic incompetence and preserve normal intrinsic AV conduction in pacemaker therapy for SSS was investigated in 15 consecutive patients (mean age 66±2 years). All had intact AV conduction (antegrade conduction capacity >100 beats. min–1 and an atrialpaced to intrinsic R interval of ≤ 220 ms). DDDR pacemakers capable of being programmed into atrial rate adaptive (AAIR), dual chamber rate adaptive (DDDR) and ventricular rate adaptive ( VVIR) modes were used Beginning with an acute study, arterial pressure was invasively assessed in each pacing mode during physiological stresses and low level exercise. In the ambulatory phase, the incidence of ventricular pacing and arrhythmias (Holier recording), diurnal blood pressure changes (ambulatory blood pressure recording), and symptom and quality of life level (questionnaires and interviews) were compared.

Despite similar heart rate changes during acute physiological stresses, a higher blood pressure was recorded during AAIR or DDDR pacing compared with VVIR pacing. Systolic blood pressure over 24 h was lower in the VVIR mode (122 ± 5 mmHg) than AAIR/DDDR pacing (129 ± 61128 ± 6 mmHg, P<0.05). VVIR pacing was associated with a higher frequency of atrial and ventricular ectopics, with two patients developing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ventricular pacing was used in a higher percentage in the DDDR compared with the VVIR mode (64 ± 11 and 39 ± 7%, P<0.03). VVIR pacing was associated with more palpitations, a lower level of general well being and depression.

Despite the use of a sensor to overcome chronotropic incompetence, VVIR pacing is a less satisfactory pacing mode for SSS. Although AAIRIDDDR pacing may achieve similar haemodynamic and clinical status, in patients with intact A V conduction, AAIR pacing may be preferable by avoiding an abnormal ventricular activation pattern

Key Words: Sick sinus syndrome • arterial pressure • pacing • quality of life


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
C.-P. Lau, H.-F. Tse, A. J. Camm, and S. S. Barold
Evolution of pacing for bradycardias: sensors
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_I): I11 - I22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
N. M van Hemel, K. J Holwerda, P. C Slegers, H. A. Spierenburg, A. A. Timmermans, J. G Meeder, P. van der Kemp, J. C Kelder, M. A. Stofmeel, and on behalf of the Sensor and Quality of Life (SQL)
The contribution of rate adaptive pacing with single or dual sensors to health-related quality of life
Europace, April 1, 2007; 9(4): 233 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
N. Musilli and L. Padeletti
Pacemaker selection: time for a rethinking of complex pacing systems?
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2006; 27(2): 132 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J.C. Nielsen, A.K. Pedersen, P.T. Mortensen, and H.R. Andersen
Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(2): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C.-P. Lau, H.-F. Tse, and G. Cheng
Effects of atrioventricular asynchrony on platelet activation: implication of thromboembolism in paced patients
Heart, October 1, 1997; 78(4): 358 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.