Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1994 15(2):277-280;
Copyright © 1994 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FIEHRLEIN, C.
Right arrow Articles by VON HODENBERG, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FIEHRLEIN, C.
Right arrow Articles by VON HODENBERG, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 The European Society of Cardiology

The role of elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty of rabbit arteries and its prevention by stent implantation

C. FIEHRLEIN, M. ZIMMERMAN, J. PILL*, J. METZ*, W. KudigrBLER and E. VON HODENBERG

Department of Cardiology and Anatomy Germany
*Department of Cardiology and Anatomy University of Heidelberg Germany

Received 10 May 1993; revised 23 August 1993; .

Coresspondence: Christoph Hehrlein, MD, Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Bergheimerstr. 58, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

Elastic recoil, neointima formation and vessel narrowing after balloon angioplasty or stent implantation were compared in 17 non-atherosclerotic New Zealand White rabbits. The implantation of a balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stent was performed in one iliac artery and a balloon angioplasty alone was performed in the contralateral artery (n=34 arteries). Quantitative histomorphometry was performed by a computer-assisted analysis 1 h and 4, 10 and 24 weeks after the initial procedure. The histological appearance of the neointima was similar to that of human restenosis. The amount of the neointima was increased within sten ted vessels as compared to balloon angioplasty alone (1·0±0·1 vs 0·4±0·1 mm2 at 4 weeks, P<0·001). However, the neointimal lumen narrowing was smaller in the stented vessels due to persistent increase in vessel perimeter as compared to balloon angio plasty alone (16·5±0·9 vs 34·7±16·5% lumen narrowing at 4 weeks, P<0·05). In conclusion, stent implantation enhances neointima formation as compared to angioplasty in non-atherosclerotic rabbits. The prevention of elastic recoil after stent implantation, however, reduces the neointimal lumen narrowing. This study supports clinical observations demonstrating lower restenosis rates after stent implantation compared to standard balloon angioplasty.

Key Words: Angioplasty • elastic recoil • intimal hyperplasia • restenosis • stent implantation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Kollum, S. Kaiser, R. Kinscherf, J. Metz, W. Kubler, and C. Hehrlein
Apoptosis After Stent Implantation Compared With Balloon Angioplasty in Rabbits : Role of Macrophages
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 1997; 17(11): 2383 - 2388.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. H. Barth, R. Virmani, J. Froelich, T. Takeda, S. V. Lossef, J. Newsome, R. Jones, and D. Lindisch
Paired Comparison of Vascular Wall Reactions to Palmaz Stents, Strecker Tantalum Stents, and Wallstents in Canine Iliac and Femoral Arteries
Circulation, June 15, 1996; 93(12): 2161 - 2169.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Hehrlein, C. Gollan, K. Donges, J. Metz, R. Riessen, P. Fehsenfeld, E. von Hodenberg, and W. Kubler
Low-Dose Radioactive Endovascular Stents Prevent Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Neointimal Hyperplasia in Rabbits
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1570 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.