Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1994 15(4):489-494;
Copyright © 1994 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by IÑGUEZ, A.
Right arrow Articles by ZARCO, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by IÑGUEZ, A.
Right arrow Articles by ZARCO, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 The European Society of Cardiology

Long-term outcome of coronary angioplasty in elderly patients with post-infarction angina

A. IÑGUEZ, C. MACAYA, R. HERNANDEZ, F. ALFONSO, J. GOICOLEA, J. M. RIBERA and P. ZARCO

Cardiopulmonar Department, Hospital Universitario ‘San Carlos’ Madrid, Spain

Received 22 May 1993; revised 22 November 1993; .

Correspondence Dr Carlos Macaya, Department Cardiopulmonar, Hospital Universitano San Carlos, cl Prof. Martin Lagos s/n., Madrid 28040, Spain

Abstract

The long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of 76 elderly (≤65 years) patients undergoing coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (83 lesions attempted) for post-infarction angina (PIA) (group I) was compared with that of 83 elderly patients undergoing PTCA (105 lesions) for stable angina (group II). Age (70 ± 4 years), gender (70% male) and major demographic variables were similar in both groups. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 56 ± 14% in group I vs 67 ± 14% in group II (P<0·01). In group I, PTCA was performed more frequently for lesions located in the right coronary artery (35% vs 18%, P<0·01) and less frequently in the left circumflex artery (12% vs 26%, P<0·05). Although the percentage of lesions with thrombi was higher in group I (16% vs 2%, P<0·0O1), the rate of angiographic success was similar in both groups: 94% (78/83 lesions) in group I vs 93% (98/105) in group II (ns). PTCA was successful in 67 patients (88%) in group I and in 74 (89%) in group II (ns). The rate of major complications was also similar in both groups (4%). Restenosis occurred in 36% vs 31% of the lesions in groups I and II respectively (mean time to angiographic follow-up 7 ±2 months) (proportion of cases with a repeat angiography: 79%in group I and 72% in group II). Restenosis was asymptomatic in 57% vs 50% of the patients respectively. Actuarial event-free survival (freedom from death, acute myocardial infarction, coronary surgery, or repeat angioplasty) after successful PTCA (mean follow-up 22 ± 17 months) was 93%, 84%, 71%, and 54% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years respectively in group I versus 90%, 80%, 74%, and 56% in group II patients (ns). At last follow-up, 92% vs 93% of our patients were still alive, and 85% vs 75% were asymptomatic (ns). In conclusion, the clinical indication (PIA versus stable angina) does not seem to affect the short term results of PTCA in elderly patients. Moreover, after a successful PTCA, elderly patients with PIA appear to have as a good mid-term outcome as those undergoing PTCA for stable angina.

Key Words: Post-infarction angina • elderly patients • coronary angioplasty


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Kahler, M. Lutke, J. Weckmuller, R. Koster, T. Meinertz, and C.W. Hamm
Coronary angioplasty in octogenarians. Quality of life and costs
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 1999; 20(24): 1791 - 1798.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.