Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1995 16(10):1410-1419;
Copyright © 1995 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VILLARI, B.
Right arrow Articles by HESS, O. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VILLARI, B.
Right arrow Articles by HESS, O. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 The European Society of Cardiology

Sex-dependent differences in left ventricular function and structure in chronic pressure overload

B. VILLARI*, S. E. CAMPBELL{dagger}, J. SCHNEIDER, G. VASSALLI, M. CHIARIELLO* and O. M. HESS

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
*Division of Cardiology, Federico II University of Naples Columbia, MO, U.S.A
{dagger}Division of Cardiology, University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO, U.S.A

revised 1 September 1994; accepted 21 December 1994.

Correspondence: Otto M. Hess. MD, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Raemistrasse 100. 8091 Zurich. Switzerland

Abstract

To evaluate gender-related differences in left ventricular (LV) structure and function in aortic stenosis, LV biplane cineangiography, micromanometry and endomyocardial biopsies were carried out in 56 patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. Patients were divided into males (M: n={theta}35), and females (F: n={theta}21). Sixteen normal subjects 8 M, 8 F) served as haemodynamic controls. Control biopsy data were obtained from six pre-transplantation donor hearts (3 M and 3 F). LV systolic function was evaluated by ejection fraction and its relationship to mean systolic circumferential wall stress, diastolic function by the time constant of LV pressure decay, peak filling rates and passive myocardial stiffness constant. Biopsy samples were evaluated for interstitial fibrosis, muscle fibre diameter and volume fraction of myofibrils. In a subset of 27 consecutive patients, biopsy samples were evaluated with a morphometric-morphological method, for total collagen volume fraction, endocardial fibrosis and the extension and thickness of orthogonal collagen fibres (cross-hatching).

In patients with aortic stenosis, aortic valve area, aortic valve resistance and mean aortic pressure gradient were comparable in males and females, whereas end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes were larger in males than females. Ejection fraction was lower (56%) in males than females (64%) (P<0.05); 20 of 35 males and four of 21 females had depressed systolic contractility when assessed with regard to the relationship ejection fraction-mean systolic stress (P<0.01). Myocardial stiffness constant was higher in males than in females (P<0.0I). Nine of 14 males and two of 13 females had endocardial fibrosis (P<0.009), whereas increased cross-hatching (> 1.5 grade) was present in 11 males and four females with aortic stenosis (P<0.0I). An abnormal collagen architecture was present in 13114 males and 5113 females (V<0.002).

In aortic stenosis, males have a depressed systolic function and abnormal passive elastic properties when compared to females with valve lesions of similar severity. Changes in collagen architecture may account, at least in part, for these differences.

Key Words: Aortic stenosis • myocardial function • collagen network • left ventricular hypertrophy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. F. Deschepper and B. Llamas
Hypertensive Cardiac Remodeling in Males and Females: From the Bench to the Bedside
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 401 - 407.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. H. Lorell and B. A. Carabello
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy : Pathogenesis, Detection, and Prognosis
Circulation, July 25, 2000; 102(4): 470 - 479.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. L. Milavetz, S. N. Hayes, S. A. Weston, J. B. Seward, C. J. Mullany, and V. L. Roger
Sex Differences in Left Ventricular Geometry in Aortic Stenosis: Impact on Outcome
Chest, April 1, 2000; 117(4): 1094 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. S. Hayward, R. P. Kelly, and P. Collins
The roles of gender, the menopause and hormone replacement on cardiovascular function
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2000; 46(1): 28 - 49.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Bech-Hanssen, I. Wallentin, E. Houltz, M. Beckman Suurkula, S. Larsson, and K. Caidahl
Gender differences in patients with severe aortic stenosis: impact on preoperative left ventricular geometry and function, as well as early postoperative morbidity and mortality
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 15(1): 24 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. S. Douglas, S. E. Katz, E. O. Weinberg, M. H. Chen, S. P. Bishop, and B. H. Lorell
Hypertrophic remodeling: gender differences in the early response to left ventricular pressure overload
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1998; 32(4): 1118 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.