Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1996 17(1):82-88;
Copyright © 1996 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 The European Society of Cardiology

Incidence of complete atrioventricular block following attempted radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node in 880 patients

Results of the Multicenter European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS)

G. Hindricks on behalf of the Multicenter European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) Investigators of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology

Received 21 July 1995; accepted 7 August 1995.

Correspondence: Gerhard Hindricks, MD, Universitätsklinik Münster, Innere Medizin C, 48129 Münster, Germany

Abstract

The Multicenter European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) retrospectively analysed the incidence of procedurerelated complications in 4463 patients who had undergone radiofrequency catheter ablation in 69 European institutions between 1987 and 1992. Of these 4463 patients, 880 underwent modification of the atrioventricular node to cure atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. This report presents a detailed analysis of the incidence of complete atrioventricular block with respect to the target site and the number of patients reported per institution.

The most common complication of modification of the atrioventricular node was the unintended induction of complete atrioventricular block (41 of 880 patients, 4.7%). In 684 of 880 patients (78%), detailed information about the approached target site for modification of the atrioventricular node was available. Complete atrioventricular block occurred significantly more often in patients who under went ablation of the fast pathway (19/361, 5 3%)or in whom ablation of the slow and fast pathway was attempted after failure at the initial site (4/25, 16%) than in patients who underwent slow pathway ablation (6/298, 20%, P<0.05). The overall incidence of complete atrioventricular block was significantly higher (6.3%) in centres with limited experience in radiofrequency modification of the atrioventricular node (≤30 patients treated; group I: n=526) compared to centres that had treated >30 patients (group TI: n=354; 2.3% P<0.05). In addition, in those patients in whom the target site was available, the incidence of complete atrioventricular block after fast pathway ablation was significantly higher in group I (n= 168 patients) when compared to group II (n=193 patients) (7.7% vs 3.1%, P<0.05) and also tended to be higher after slow pathway ablation in group I(2.4% in group I vs 1.5% in group II; P=ns)

CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of collaborative data, radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node carried a risk of approximately 5% of complete atrioventricular block. The incidence of complete atrioventricular block was significantly higher in patients who underwent fast pathway ablation or fast and slow pathway ablation after failure at the initial site compared with slow pathway ablation. In addition, the results indicate that there is a learning curve, regarding the incidence of complete atrioventricular block, which is a significant complication of the procedure, when modifying the atrioventricular node. Thus, caution is recommended when performing radiofrequency modification of the atrioventricular node using the so-called anterior approach to abolish fast pathway conduction, especially when the experience of the institution or investigator/s is limited.

(Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 82–88)

Key Words: Arrhythmias • catheter ablation • complications


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. Bastani, J. Schwieler, P. Insulander, F. Tabrizi, F. Braunschweig, G. Kenneback, N. Drca, B. Sadigh, and M. Jensen-Urstad
Acute and long-term outcome of cryoablation therapy of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Europace, August 1, 2009; 11(8): 1077 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. E. Eckart and L. M. Epstein
Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1357 - 1374.
[Full Text]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Khairy, P. G. Novak, P. G. Guerra, I. Greiss, L. Macle, D. Roy, M. Talajic, B. Thibault, and M. Dubuc
Cryothermal slow pathway modification for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 909 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, M. A. Creager, D. R. Holmes Jr, G. Merli, G. P. Rodgers, C. M. Tracy, et al.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2006 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Invasive Electrophysiology Studies, Catheter Ablation, and Cardioversion: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training Developed in Collaboration With the Heart Rhythm Society
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1503 - 1517.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G.-J. P. Kimman, D. A.M.J. Theuns, P. A. Janse, M. Rivero-Ayerza, M. F. Scholten, T. Szili-Torok, and L. J. Jordaens
One-year follow-up in a prospective, randomized study comparing radiofrequency and cryoablation of arrhythmias in Koch's triangle: clinical symptoms and event recording
Europace, August 1, 2006; 8(8): 592 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G.P. Kimman, D.A.M.J. Theuns, T. Szili-Torok, M.F. Scholten, J.C. Res, and L.J. Jordaens
CRAVT: a prospective, randomized study comparing transvenous cryothermal and radiofrequency ablation in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2004; 25(24): 2232 - 2237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
S. D. Satti and L. M. Epstein
Cardiologic Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1253 - 1270.
[Full Text]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. S. Manolis, T. Maounis, V. Vassilikos, J. Chiladakis, and D. V. Cokkinos
Arrhythmia recurrences are rare when the site of radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway is medial or anterior to the coronary sinus os
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(2): 193 - 199.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K J Lipscomb, A M Zaidi, A P Fitzpatrick, and D LEFROY
Slow pathway modification for atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia: fast junctional tachycardia predicts adverse prognosis
Heart, January 1, 2001; 85(1): 44 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. H.F. Cheng, G. D. Sanders, M. A. Hlatky, P. Heidenreich, K. M. McDonald, B. K. Lee, M. S. Larson, and D. K. Owens
Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation for Supraventricular Tachycardia
Ann Intern Med, December 5, 2000; 133(11): 864 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. C. Skanes, M. Dubuc, G. J. Klein, B. Thibault, A. D. Krahn, R. Yee, D. Roy, P. Guerra, and M. Talajic
Cryothermal Ablation of the Slow Pathway for the Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
Circulation, December 5, 2000; 102(23): 2856 - 2860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, W. L. Winters, J. L. Achord, A. W. Boone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, B. H. Lorell, et al.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on invasive electrophysiology studies, catheter ablation, and cardioversion: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association/american college of physicians-american society of internal medicine task force on clinical competence
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1725 - 1736.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Tracy, M. Akhtar, J. P. DiMarco, D. L. Packer, H. H. Weitz, W. L. Winters, J. L. Achord, A. W. Boone, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, B. H. Lorell, et al.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Invasive Electrophysiology Studies, Catheter Ablation, and Cardioversion : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence
Circulation, October 31, 2000; 102(18): 2309 - 2320.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. Heidbuchel
How to ablate typical 'slow/fast' AV nodal reentry tachycardia
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(1): 15 - 19.
[PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
F. Duru, U. Bauersfeld, and R. Candinas
Autonomic effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 181 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G.P. Kimman, N.M. van Hemel, E.R. Jessurun, P.F.H.M. van Dessel, J.C. Kelder, J.J.A.M.T. Defauw, and G.M. Guiraudon
Comparison of late results of surgical or radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 1999; 20(7): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. J. J. Wellens
Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias : Usually Cure, but Complications May Occur
Circulation, January 19, 1999; 99(2): 195 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.