Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1996 17(11):1710-1716;
Copyright © 1996 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schömig, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schömig, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 The European Society of Cardiology

Initial experience with implantation of internal cardioverter/defibrillators under local anaesthesia by electrophysiologists

C. Schmitt, E. Alt, A. Plewan and A. Schömig

From the I. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München Germany

Received 29 January 1996; accepted 4 February 1996.

Correspondence: C. Schmitt, MD, 1 Medizinische Klinik, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr 22. 81675 Mürichen, Germany

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the implantation of internal cardioverter/defibrillators under local anaesthesia by electrophysiologists and to compare this to our former experience of implants with general anaesthesia.

Forty-seven internal cardioverter/defibrillators were implanted at our institution by electrophysiologists. Twenty-nine operations were performed under general anaesthesia (isoflurane0.4–0.6% and 18 under local anaesthesia (mepivacain 1%). The defibrillator leads were introduced by venotomy of the cephalic vein (n=25), puncture of the subclavian vein (n=17) or both (n=5). All devices were implanted beneath the pectoral muscles.

The mean operation time was 99 ± 29 mm. In the group with local anaesthesia the operation time was significantly shorter than with general anaesthesia (86 ± 20 min vs 107 ± 31 min; P=0.027).The defibrillation threshold with biphasic shock application was below 24 J in all patients; thus, the implantation of an additional subcutaneous patch electrode was unnecessary. There were no major complications in either group. However, modifications were required in four patients: in one a set screw had to be re-tightened after delivery of an erroneous shock in the early postoperative phase; in another, device migration occurred several weeks after implantation, but no therapeutic intervention was required; in another, a rise in pacing threshold and partial sensing loss were noted ten days postoperatively; in the fourth, a minor pneumothorax occurred after subclavian puncture, but no further treatment was necessary. There was no intra-operative or postoperative mortality in either group.

Implantation of internal cardioverter/defibrillators under local anaesthesia and mild sedation is feasible, and can be safely performed by electrophysiologists experienced in basic surgery. The newly developed smaller devices allow implantation in the subpectoral region, and with ‘active can’ configuration and biphasic shock application, subcutaneous patch electrodes become unnecessary.

Key Words: Internal cardioverter • defibrillator • implantation techniques • local anaesthesia • mild sedation • electrophysiologists


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Marquie, A. Duchemin, D. Klug, N. Lamblin, F. Mizon, H. Cordova, M. Boulo, D. Lacroix, A. Pol, and S. Kacet
Can we implant cardioverter defibrillator under minimal sedation?
Europace, July 1, 2007; 9(7): 545 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.