Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1996 17(12):1828-1835;
Copyright © 1996 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Miltenburg-van Zijl, A. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Veerhoek, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Miltenburg-van Zijl, A. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Veerhoek, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 The European Society of Cardiology

Variation in the use of coronary angiography in patients with unstable angina is related to differences in patient population and availability of angiography facilities, without affecting prognosis

A. J. M. van Miltenburg-van Zijl*,{dagger},, M. L. Simoons*, P. M. M. Bossuyt§, T. R. Taylor{ddagger} and M. J. Veerhoek

*Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Rotterdam The Netherlands
{dagger}Center for Clinical Decision Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam The Netherlands
§Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
{ddagger}Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
Sint Fanciscus Gasthuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

Received 19 February 1996; accepted 26 February 1996.

Correspondence: A. J. M. van Miltenburg-van Zijl, MD. PhD.do M. L. Simoons. Thoraxcenter Bd434. University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt. Dr. Molewaterplein 40, P.O. Box 1738. 3000 Dr Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Examination of the difference in management strategies with respect to coronary angiography in patients with unstable angina pectoris, and the consequences of this difference on prognosis.

DESIGN: Prospective registration of consecutive patients admitted to two different hospitals.

SETTING: University and a large community hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

SUBJECTS: Patients under 80 years, without recent (<4 weeks) infarction or recent (<6 months) coronary revascularization procedure, admitted for chest pain suspected to indicate unstable angina pectoris.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Decision to initiate coronary angiography or to continue on medical treatment. At 6 months the occurrence of death and myocardial infarction was measured.

RESULTS: Clinical variables associated with the decision to initiate angiography were young age, male gender, progression of angina, multiple pain episodes and use of ß-blocker or calcium antagonists before admission, abnormal ST-T segment on baseline ECG, recurrent pain in hospital, and ECG changes during pain. These associations did not differ between hospitals. Nevertheless, angiography was performed more often in the presence of angiography facilities (university hospital), independent of the variable case-mix. Survival and infarct-free survival were similar in both hospitals, 96% and 90% respectively.

CONCLUSION: The difference in angiography rate for unstable angina can be explained in part by differences in patient population and hospital facilities, but no difference was observed in physicians' assessment of patient characteristics. The observed practice variation did not affect prognosis.

Key Words: Unstable angina • coronary angiography • practice variation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
N Nante, G Messina, M Cecchini, O Bertetto, F Moirano, and M McKee
Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment
J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2009; 63(3): 203 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E.R. Ferreiros, R. Kevorkian, J.J. Fuselli, J. Guetta, C.P. Boissonnet, D. di Toro, R. Cragnolino, O. Masoli, A. Cagide, and J. Krauss
First national survey on management strategies in non ST-elevation acute ischaemic syndromes in Argentina. Results of the STRATEG-SIA study
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2002; 23(13): 1021 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Ronner, E. Boersma, K.M. Akkerhuis, R.A. Harrington, A.M. Lincoff, J.W. Deckers, K. Karsch, N.S. Kleiman, A. Vahanian, E.J. Topol, et al.
Patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST elevation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention benefit most from early intervention with protection by a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2002; 23(3): 239 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Lupon, V. Valle, J. Marrugat, R. Elosua, L. Seres, M. Pavesi, R. Freixa, G. Sanz, R. Masia, L. Molina, et al.
Six-month outcome in unstable angina patients without previous myocardial infarction according to the use of tertiary cardiologic resources
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1999; 34(7): 1947 - 1953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. J.M. Van Miltenburg-Van Zijl, P. M.M. Bossuyt, R. W. Nette, M. L. Simoons, and T. R. Taylor
Cardiologists' Use of Clinical Information for Management Decisions for Patients with Unstable Angina:: A Policy Analysis
Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 292 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.