Copyright © 1996 by the European Society of Cardiology.
© 1996 The European Society of Cardiology
Assessing coronary stenosis. Quantitative coronary angiography versus visual estimation from cine-film or pharmacological stress perfusion images
University of Vienna, Department of Cardiology Waehringer Guertel, Vienna, Austria
revised 1 June 1995; accepted 7 August 1995.
Dr Michael Gottsauner-Wolf, Universitatsklinik f. Innere Medizin II, Abteiluing f. Kardiologie, Waehringer Guertel 1820, A. 1090 Vienna, Austria
Abstract
Visual judgment of stenosis severity from cine-film or single-photon emission computed tomographic dipyrida-mole perfusion images was compared to assessment of stenosis severity as measured with digital quantitative coronary angiography. Thirty patients with angiographically verified single-vessel disease underwent dipyridamole thallium stress testing within 90 days of angiography.
RESULTS: A percent diameter stenosis of
50%, a percent area stenosis of
75% and a stenotic flow reserve of <3·75 measured by quantitative coronary angiography (CMS, version 1·1, Medis Inc.) corresponded to haemodynamically significant stenosis as evaluated by visual estimates from cine-film or perfusion images. Quantitative coronary angiography percent diameter stenosis (51·2% ± 12·6%) correlated closely (r=0·74) but underestimated significantly visual assessment of stenosis severity from cine-film (69·3% ±21·2% p=0·0001). However, quantitative coronary angiography percent area stenosis (74·7% ± 11·7%) more closely reflected visual estimates from cine-film (P=0·19). Quantitative coronary angiography stenotic flow reserve showed the highest positive and negative predictive value regarding visual estimates from cine-film (88%, 86%) or perfusion images (88% 64%) followed by percent diameter stenosis (86% 75% 86% 56%) and percent area stenosis (87% 80% 87% 60%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of coronary lesions by quantitative coronary angiography corresponds closely with visual estimates from cine-film and haemodynamic significance as evaluated by dipyridamole perfusion images. (Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 11671174)
Key Words: Coronary disease coronary angiography dipyridamole tomography emission-computed single photon
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Malagutti, K. Nieman, W. B. Meijboom, C. A.G. van Mieghem, F. Pugliese, F. Cademartiri, N. R. Mollet, E. Boersma, P. P. de Jaegere, and P. J. de Feyter Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2007; 28(15): 1879 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Gardner Searching for the Second-Best Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Is It the Radial Artery? Circulation, February 13, 2007; 115(6): 678 - 680. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Desai, C. D. Naylor, A. Kiss, E. A. Cohen, R. Feder-Elituv, S. Miwa, S. Radhakrishnan, J. Dubbin, L. Schwartz, S. E. Fremes, et al. Impact of Patient and Target-Vessel Characteristics on Arterial and Venous Bypass Graft Patency: Insight From a Randomized Trial Circulation, February 13, 2007; 115(6): 684 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sahara, H. Kirigaya, Y. Oikawa, J. Yajima, K. Nagashima, H. Hara, K. Ogasawara, and T. Aizawa Soft plaque detected on intravascular ultrasound is the strongest predictor of in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2004; 25(22): 2026 - 2033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gottsauner-Wolf, G. Zasmeta, S. Hornykewycz, M. Nikfardjam, E. Stepan, P. Wexberg, G. Zorn, D. Glogar, P. Probst, G. Maurer, et al. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein after coronary stent implantation Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2000; 21(14): 1152 - 1158. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

