Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1997 18(2):311-317;
Copyright © 1997 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Englund, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Englund, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 The European Society of Cardiology

The RR index test for the differentiation of atrioventricular nodal block from His—Purkinje block during incremental atrial pacing in patients with bifascicular block

A. Englund

Karolinska Institute, Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital Stockholm, Sweden

revised 26 July 1996; accepted 1 August 1996.

Correspondence: Anders Englund, MD. PhD. Department of Cardiology, Thoracic Clinics, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

AIMS: His—Purkinje block induced by incremental atrial pacing is highly predictive of an impending high degree atrioventricular block in patients with bifascicular block. The His potential is, however, sometimes not measurable or is lost in the ventricular depolarization. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the comparison of RR intervals before and after atrioventricular block, induced by incremental atrial pacing, could differentiate between atrioventricular nodal and His—Purkinje block in patients with bifascicular block.

METHODS AND RESULTS: In 98 patients with bifascicular block, incremental atrial pacing was performed as part of an invasive electrophysiological study. An ‘RR index’ was constructed by calculating the numerical difference between the RR interval immediately before and after the atrioventricular block divided by the RR interval immediately before the pacing-induced block. Endocavitary recording of the His bundle potential was used for defining the level of atrioventricular block. The median RR index was 0·98 (range 0·88–1·02) in recordings with His—Purkinje block and 0·49 (range 0·11–0·89) in recordings with atrioventricular nodal block (P<0·001). An RR index of ≥0·85 had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% for the identification of atrioventricular block localized to the His—Purkinje system.

CONCLUSION: The use of an RR index is a helpful tool in the differentiation of His—Purkinje from atrioventricular nodal block in patients with bifascicular block undergoing incremental atrial pacing as part of an invasive electrophysical study.

Key Words: Bifascicular block • high-degree atrioventricular block • electrophysiological study


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EuropaceHome page
D. Klug, D. Lacroix, C. Marquie, G. Mairesse, D. Alix, S. Dennetiere, B. d'Hautefeuille, N. Zghal, and S. Kacet
Prospective evaluation of a simplified approach for common atrial flutter radio frequency ablation with only two catheters
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 208 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.