Skip Navigation

Correction for Dernellis et al., Eur Heart J 18 (2) 354.
European Heart Journal 1997 18(2):354;
Copyright © 1997 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spiers, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Silke, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Spiers, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Silke, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 The European Society of Cardiology

Inhibition of the acetylcholine-activated potassium current by endothelin-1 in atrial cardiomyocytes

J. P. Spiers, E. J. Kelso{dagger}, B J McDermott{dagger}, N Scholfield{dagger} and B. Silke{dagger}

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Queen's University of Belfast Belfast BT9 7BL, U.K.
{dagger}Department of Therapeutics & Pharmacology, The Queen's University of Belfast Belfast BT9 7BL, U.K.

Abstract

Endothelin-1 (ET-1), is a 21 amino-acid peptide with potent inotropic and chronotropic actions in the heart. Relatively little is known about the underlying electrophysiological effects of the peptide. In this study the effects of ET-1 on the acetylcholine-activated potassium current (IK(Ach)) were investigated in the absence and presence of the receptor-selective antagonists, PD155080 (ETA receptor-selective) and RES-701 (ETB receptor-selective) in atrial cardiomyocytes.

Cells were obtained from New Zealand White rabbits (2·5–3 kg) by enzymatic dissociation using collagenase. Potassium currents were recorded, in the presence of nifedipine (5 µM), using the whole cell ruptured patch-clamp technique. Low resistance electrodes (1–3 Mohm) were filled with potassium gluconate solution (pH 7·2). Cells were superfused with a modified Tyrode's solution. Following stabilization, control recordings were made using standard pulse protocols, and drugs were applied using a gravity fed microperfusion system. Data were expressed as mean±standard error, and comparisons were made using Friedman's ANOVA and Wilcoxon's Signed Ranks tests; p<0·05 was considered significant

ET-1 (10 nM) alone did not affect the potassium current. Acetylcholine (Ach, 1 µM) increased (p<0·05) the potassium current to –1321±290 pA, from a control value of –955±191 pA, at a step potential of –100 mV. This change in current is attributed to IK(Ach) as it was blocked by atropine (10 µM). ET-1 (10 nM) inhibited (p<0.05) the IK(Ach) obtained in the presence of Ach (–882±88 compared to a control value of –870±98 pA) Ach also increased the holding current from +80±9 to ±242±38 pA, and this effect was blocked (p<0·05) in the presence of ET-1 (44±13 pA). The ETA receptor-selective antagonist, PD155080 (1 µM), prevented (p<0·05) the ET-1 induced inhibition of IK(Ach) (control vs Ach±ET-1+PD155080: –804±224 vs –1030±210 pA; at –100 mV; n=6). The ETB receptor-selective antagonist, RES-701 (1 µM), also prevented (p<0·05) the inhibitory effect of ET-1 on IK(Ach) (control vs Ach+ET-1+RES-701: –733±116 vs –913±137 pA; at –100 mV; n=6). However, unlike PD155080, RES-701 failed to sustain this inhibitory effect after a further 90 s exposure to Ach and ET-1 (control vs Ach+ET-1+RES-701; –733±116 vs 768±96 pA; at –100mV; n=6).

In summary, ET-1 clearly inhibits the effects of Ach on IK(Ach) in rabbit atrial cardiomyocytes. This effect is mediated by an ETA receptor-subtype, and an RES-701 -sensitive ETB receptor subtype.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.