Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1997 18(4):636-642;
Copyright © 1997 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gadler, F.
Right arrow Articles by Rydén, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gadler, F.
Right arrow Articles by Rydén, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 The European Society of Cardiology

Long-term effects of dual chamber pacing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without outflow tract obstruction at rest

F. Gadler*,, C. Linde*, A. Juhlin-Dannfelt, A. Ribeiro and L. Rydén*

*Departments of Cardiology and Clinical Physiology Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

revised 4 July 1996; accepted 11 July 1996.

Correspondence: Fredrik Gadler, MD, Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital, S-l71 76 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular-synchronous pacing is beneficial in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. The effects of pacing in patients without significant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction at rest are, however, less well explored. This study compares the long-term outcome of pacing patients with and without significant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction at rest.

METHODS: Forty-one patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy were studied, 19 with a left ventricular outflow tract gradient <40 mmHg at rest, but exceeding 50 mmHg during provocation with isoproterenol (group A), and 22 with a left ventricular outflow tract obstruction >40 mmHg at rest (group B). Before the implantation of a permanent pacemaker, the patients were studied according to a temporary pacing protocol. This included graded isoproterenol provocation of the left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, which was assessed by echo Doppler. Following permanent pacemaker implantation, the patients were regularly followed up with echo Doppler, exercise testing and monitoring of the clinical condition.

RESULTS: Isoproterenol provocation was reproducible and the technique did not cause any clinically important side effects. Left ventricular outflow tract gradient reduction after chronic pacing did not differ between the two groups. In group A, it decreased from 98±30 mmHg in sinus rhythm to 42±26 mmHg during pacing. The corresponding values in group B were 87±40 mmHg to 36±24 mmHg. The clinical condition improved similarly in the two groups. Exercise capacity increased significantly and perceived dyspnoea and angina pectoris were significantly lower at submaximal levels of exercise after 6 months of pacing.

CONCLUSION: Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy patients who only exhibit significant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction during provocation benefit as much from pacemaker treatment as do patients who already have significant obstruction at rest. Isoproterenol is a safe and reproducible method for pre-pacing evaluation of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy patients.

Key Words: Outflow tract obstruction • isoproterenol provocation • cardiac pacing • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-J. Blanc, J.-C. Daubert, H. Drexler, H. Ector, M. Gasparini, C. Linde, F. B. Morgado, et al.
Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association
Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 959 - 998.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-J. Blanc, J.-C. Daubert, H. Drexler, H. Ector, M. Gasparini, C. Linde, F. B. Morgado, et al.
Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2256 - 2295.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C A Rinaldi, C A Bucknall, and J S Gill
Beneficial effects of biventricular pacing in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay
Heart, June 1, 2002; 87(6): e6 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
F. Gadler
Pacing in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2001; 3(suppl_L): L32 - L37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
L.J. Kappenberger, C. Linde, X. Jeanrenaud, C. Daubert, W. McKenna, E. Meisel, N. Sadoul, L. Chojnowska, L. Guize, D. Gras, et al.
Clinical progress after randomized on/off pacemaker treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(2): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.