Copyright © 1997 by the European Society of Cardiology.
© 1997 The European Society of Cardiology
Combined use of dobutamine echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting regional dysfunction recovery after coronary revascularization in patients with recent myocardial infarction
Department of Cardiology University of Rome Rome, Italy
*Cardiac Surgery, ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome Rome, Italy
revised 20 May 1996; accepted 29 May 1996.
Correspondence: Luciano Agati, MD, Lungotevere Flaminio 60, 00196 Rome, Italy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial contrast echocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography have recently emerged as potentially useful clinical tools to detect reversible myocardial dysfunction. However, the relative accuracy of these two techniques in predicting regional wall motion improvement after coronary interventions is still unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare their diagnostic value in predicting functional recovery after coronary revascularization in patients with recent acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent myocardial contrast echocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography within 2 weeks of hospital admission. Infarct zone contrast score and wall motion score indexes were derived in each patient. Infarct-related artery revascularization was performed before hospital discharge in all selected patients. Resting echocardiography was repeated 3 months after revascularization, and regional function recovery was analysed. The degree of wall motion score improvement at 3-month follow-up and the percentage of positive responses to dobutamine echo were greater (P<0·001 and P<0·002, respectively) in patients with a higher baseline contrast score (
0·50). Conversely, no significant changes were observed either during dobutamine echo or after revascularization in the group of patients without residual perfusion within the infarct area. Diagnostic agreement between both techniques in predicting reversible dysfunction was high (81% of segments). The sensitivity and negative predictive value in predicting functional outcome were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87% to 100%) and 100% (95% CI, 93% to 100%) by contrast echo, and 85% (95% CI, 66% to 96%) and 93% (95% CI, 84% to 98%) by dobutamine echo. The specificity and positive predictive value were 90% (95% CI, 80% to 96%) and 81% (95% CI, 64% to 93%) by contrast echo, and 88% (95% CI, 78% to 95%) and 76% (95% CI, 58% to 90%) by dobutamine echo. The combination of myocardial contrast and dobutamine echocardiography positive responses improved specificity and positive predictive value in detecting functional recovery after revascularization to 100% (95% CI, 94% to 100%) and 100% (95% CI, 85% to 100%), respectively. However, the sensitivity and negative predictive value slightly decreased with the use of both methods (85% [95% CI, 66% to 96%)] and (93% [95% CI, 85% to 98%)], respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recent myocardial infarction, reversible dysfunction after coronary revascularization and the response to dobutamine infusion are strictly dependent on microvascular integrity. However, microvascular perfusion does not always imply functional recovery after coronary revascularization. The integration with dob utamine echo results seems particularly helpful to further improve myocardial contrast echo specificity and positive predictive values.
Key Words: Myocardial viability • dobutamine stress echocardiography • myocardial contrast echocardiography
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. A. Dijkmans, R. Senior, H. Becher, T. R. Porter, K. Wei, C. A. Visser, and O. Kamp Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion: The Evidence So Far J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 5, 2006; 48(11): 2168 - 2177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Leung and W. H. Bellows Post-CABG Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1861 - 1861. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Bilotta, L. Agati, L. Fiorani, and G. Rosa Post-CABG Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1860 - 1861. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A Hagendorff, A Goeckritz, D Pfeiffer, and H Becher Myocardial contrast echocardiography demonstrates myocardial hypoperfusion in the LAD territory in patients with acute chest pain at rest--a prospective study using power Doppler harmonic imaging with intravenous bolus application Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2004; 5(2): 132 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Main, A. Magalski, B. A. Morris, M. M. Coen, D. G. Skolnick, and T. H. Good Combined assessment of microvascular integrity and contractile reserve improves differentiation of stunning and necrosis after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1079 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Agati, S. Funaro, M. Madonna, C. Volponi, G. Veneroso, and G. Tonti Clinical utility of contrast echocardiography in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C27 - C34. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Main, A. Magalski, N. K. Chee, M. M. Coen, D. G. Skolnick, and T. H. Good Full-motion pulse inversion power Doppler contrast echocardiography differentiates stunning from necrosis and predicts recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1390 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. A. Swinburn, A. Lahiri, and R. Senior Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts recovery of dysynergic myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2001; 38(1): 19 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E Eeckhout and M.J Kern The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2001; 22(9): 729 - 739. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F Leclercq, P Messner-Pellenc, Q Descours, J-P Daures, J-L Pasquie, F-X Hager, J-M Davy, and R Grolleau-Raoux Combined assessment of reflow and collateral blood flow by myocardial contrast echocardiography after acute reperfused myocardial infarction Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 62 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Czitrom, D Karila-Cohen, E Brochet, J M Juliard, M Faraggi, M-C Aumont, P Assayag, and P G Steg Acute assessment of microvascular perfusion patterns by myocardial contrast echocardiography during myocardial infarction: relation to timing and extent of functional recovery Heart, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 12 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Brochet, D. Czitrom, D. Karila-Cohen, P. Seknadji, M. Faraggi, H. Benamer, P. Aubry, P. G. Steg, and P. Assayag Early changes in myocardial perfusion patterns after myocardial infarction: relation with contractile reserve and functional recovery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 2011 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|