Copyright © 1997 by the European Society of Cardiology.
© 1997 The European Society of Cardiology
Heart rate variability as a means of assessing prognosis after acute myocardial infarction
A 3-year follow-up study
*Karolinska Institute at the Department of cardiology Stockholm, Sweden
Karolinska Institute at the Department of Clinical Physiology, South Hospital Stockholm, Sweden
Karolinska Institute at the Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden
revised 30 May 1996; accepted 5 June 1996.
Correspondence: Miguel Quintana, MD, Phd, Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Danderyds Hospital, S 182 88 Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract
AIMS: The present study evaluated the prognostic value of heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction in comparison with other known risk factors. The cut-off points that maximized the hazards ratio were also explored.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Heart rate variability was assessed with 24 h ambulatory electrocardiography in 74 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 4±2 days after hospital admission and in 24 healthy controls. Patients were followed for 36±15 months.
RESULTS: During follow-up, 18 patients died, nine suffered a non-fatal infarction and 20 underwent revascularization procedures. Heart rate variability was higher in survivors than in non-survivors (P=0·0005) This difference was found at higher statistical levels when comparing non-survivors vs controls (P=0·0002) A similar statistically significant difference was also found between survivors vs controls (P=0·04). Patients suffering non-fatal infarction and cardiac events (defined as death, non-fatal infarction or revascularization) had a lower heart rate variability than those without (P=0·03 and P=0·03, respectively). With multivariate regression analysis, decreased heart rate vari ability independently predicted mortality and death or non-fatal infarction. The presence of a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and a history of systemic hypertension were, however, stronger predictors. The cut-off points that maximized the hazards ratio using the Cox model differed from those reported by others.
CONCLUSIONS: Decreased heart rate variability independently predicted poor prognosis after myocardial infarction. However, the cut-off points that should be used in clinical practice are still a matter for further investigation.
Key Words: Heart rate variability • myocardial infarction • prognosis
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M.S. Kostapanos, E.N. Liberopoulos, J.A. Goudevenos, D.P. Mikhailidis, and M.S. Elisaf Do statins have an antiarrhythmic activity? Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2007; 75(1): 10 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W. Smoller, M. H. Pollack, S. Wassertheil-Smoller, R. Brunner, D. Curb, J. Torner, A. Oberman, S. L. Hendrix, J. Hsia, and D. S. Sheps Panic Attacks, Daily Life Ischemia, and Chest Pain in Postmenopausal Women Psychosom Med, November 1, 2006; 68(6): 824 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.-W. Tsai, W.-C. Chie, T. B. Kuo, M.-F. Chen, J.-P. Liu, T. H.-H. Chen, and Y.-T. Wu Effects of Exercise Training on Heart Rate Variability After Coronary Angioplasty Physical Therapy, May 1, 2006; 86(5): 626 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I Janszky, M Ericson, M Blom, A Georgiades, J-O Magnusson, H Alinagizadeh, and S Ahnve Wine drinking is associated with increased heart rate variability in women with coronary heart disease Heart, March 1, 2005; 91(3): 314 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|