Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1997 18(6):911-918;
Copyright © 1997 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Billing, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rehnqvist, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Billing, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rehnqvist, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 The European society of Cardiology

Psychosocial variables in female vs male patients with stable angina pectoris and matched healthy controls

E. Billing*,, P. Hjemadhl{dagger} and N. Rehnqvist*

*Department of Medicine, Danderyd Hospital Danderyd, Sweden
{dagger}Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Hospital Stockholm, Sweden

Received 19 May 1996; accepted 28 May 1996.

Correspondence: Ewa Billing, Department of Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, S-182 88 Danderyd, Sweden

Abstract

AIM: This study was set up to evaluate psychosocial risk factors in patients with stable angina pectoris, with particular attention to gender differences, as this has previously been studied mainly in relation to myocardial infarction in males.

MATERIAL: Seven hundred and sixty-seven patients (236 women) were studied. They were selected from the 809 patients included in the Angina Prognosis Study in Stockholm (APSIS), and 50 matched healthy subjects.

METHOD: Data were gathered by structured psychosocial interviews on inclusion into the APSIS study.

RESULTS: Patients with stable angina pectoris experienced significantly more stressful events, and suffered more frequently from disturbed and psychosomatic symptoms than healthy controls. At work they experienced less skill discretion and less control. The patients had higher rating scores for hostility and lower levels of self-rated overall well-being. With regard to gender differences, women were more likely to suffer from the strain of work, psychosomatic symptoms, disturbed sleep and stressful events than male patients. Females rated less type A-behaviour and hostility than males.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that previously known psychosocial risk factors for acute myocardial in farction are more common in patients with stable angina pectoris than in controls, and differ between female and male patients

Key Words: Angina pectoris • psychosocial factors • sleep disturbances • psychosomatic symptoms • type-A behaviour • work strain • life satisfaction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
S. E. Hofkamp, C. A. Henrikson, and S. T. Wegener
An Interactive Model of Pain and Myocardial Ischemia
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2007; 69(7): 632 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Lee, G. Colditz, L. Berkman, and I. Kawachi
A prospective study of job strain and coronary heart disease in US women
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2002; 31(6): 1147 - 1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. A. Alter, C. D. Naylor, P. C. Austin, and J. V. Tu
Biology or bias: practice patterns and long-term outcomes for men and women with acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1909 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
M. Dempster and M. Donnelly
A Comparative Analysis of the SF-12 and the SF-36 among Ischaemic Heart Disease Patients
J Health Psychol, December 1, 2001; 6(6): 707 - 711.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.