Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1997 18(9):1447-1456;
Copyright © 1997 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avanzini, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avanzini, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 The European Society of Cardiology

Use of beta-blocking agents in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: a case for evidence-based medicine?

GISSI experience, 1984–1993

F. Avanzini, G. Zuanetti, R. Latini, F. Colombo, E. Santoro, A. P. Maggioni, M. G. Franzosi, G. Tognoni and on behalf of the Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulla Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) Investigators*,

Department of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri’ Milano, Italy

revised 10 March 1997; accepted 13 March 1997.

Correspondence: GISSI Coordinating Center, Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milano, Italy

Abstract

AIMS: Many clinical trials conducted in the 1970s and early 1980s have shown that the long-term use of beta-blockers after an acute myocardial infarction significantly reduces mortality and reinfarction rates. This study assessed the impact of these findings in clinical practice.

METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the beta-blocker prescriptions for 36 817 patients with acute myocardial infarction included in three large randomized clinical trials (Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulla Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico—GISSI, 1, 2 and 3), conducted by a highly representative sample (about 75%) of Italian coronary care units in 1984–85, 1988–89 and 1991–93.

RESULTS: The prescription of beta-blockers at discharge increased gradually from 8·5% in 1984–85 to 25·0% in 1988–89 and to 31·4% in 1991–93. A similar trend was apparent for beta-blocker prescriptions 6 months after acute myocardial infarction. The strongest predictors of beta-blocker prescription are the presence of post-infarctual angina and a history of arterial hypertension. Besides the classical contraindications, advanced age, transitory cardiac failure or arrhythmias in the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction are important predictors of nonprescription.

CONCLUSION: The use of beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction in Italy has increased more than three-fold in the last decade, but they are still prescribed to too few patients, especially those at higher risk, for whom the expected benefit is greater.

Key Words: Beta-blockers • myocardial infarction • secondary prevention • pharmaco-epidemiology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S.N Willich, J Muller-Nordhorn, M Kulig, S Binting, H Gohlke, H Hahmann, K Bestehorn, K Krobot, and H Voller
Cardiac risk factors, medication, and recurrent clinical events after acute coronary disease. A prospective cohort study
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2001; 22(4): 307 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
S. Doshi and B. N. Singh
Reducing Perioperative Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery: A Time to Delineate Simpler Strategies?
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(2): 69 - 75.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.