Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1998 19(12):1872-1878; doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1232
Copyright © 1998 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hakala, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Tilvis, R.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hakala, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Tilvis, R.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Determinants and significance of declining blood pressure in old age. A prospective birth cohort study

HakalaS.-M. a and R.S. Tilvisaf1

a Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

accepted July 15, 1998

Aims

To investigate the changes in blood pressure and their causes in an elderly population.

Methods

Orthostatic blood pressure measurements were performed in randomly in four birth cohorts (years 65–, 75–, 80– and 85, n=773) at 5-year intervals.

Results

Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased in both genders and all age groups. The falls in blood pressure related closely to initial blood pressure values and to the thickness of the left ventricular posterior wall of the heart. The changes in supine (r=0·118,P=0·007) and standing systolic blood pressure (r=0·123,P=0·005), as well as supine (r=0·148,P<0·001) and standing diastolic blood pressure (r=0·186,P<0·001) correlated with changes in body weight. Changes in supine diastolic blood pressure also related to changes in serum cholesterol (r=0·207,P=0·002) and triglycerides (r=0·160,P=0·016). Changes in supine and standing systolic and standing diastolic blood pressures also related to changes in dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (r=0·161,P<0·05; r=0·205,P<0·01; r=0·140,P<0·05, respectively). Changes in blood pressure also correlated with self-estimated poor health after 5 years (r for supine systolic blood pressure=–0·133,P<0·001, for standing systolic blood pressure=–0·135,P<0·001, for supine diastolic blood pressure=–0·111,P<0·002). Patients who were institutionalized during the follow-up or who had severely impaired performance capacity after 5 years, displayed the most marked decline in blood pressure. Declining systolic blood pressure was also related to impaired survival prognosis. According to the logistic regression analyses the baseline blood pressure, antihypertensive drugs and changes in dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate and cholesterol explained over 30% of the changes in blood pressure. In the logistic models, declining blood pressure was associated with baseline blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment, poor health after 5 years, and decreasing cholesterol and triglycerides.

Conclusion

Decline in blood pressure in old age is associated with deteriorating health and is only partly explained by the use of antihypertensive drugs.

Key Words: Blood pressure • hypertension • aged

f1 Correspondence: Professor Reijo S. Tilvis, MD, Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. H. Messerli and G. S. Panjrath
The J-curve between blood pressure and coronary artery disease or essential hypertension: exactly how essential?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 10, 2009; 54(20): 1827 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.