Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1998 19(5):727-736; doi:10.1053/euhj.1997.0827
Copyright © 1998 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Penco, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dagianti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Penco, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dagianti, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Degree of residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery. Another variable affecting recovery of regional function after thrombolysis

M. Pencoaf1, A. Dagiantib, S. Romanob, C. Iacobonib, A. Vitarellib, F. Fedeleb and A. Dagiantib

a Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Public Health, University of L’Aquila
b Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, ‘La Sapienza’ University, Rome, Italy

accepted October 13, 1997

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between infarct-related artery residual stenosis, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography, and left ventricular function changes during the in-hospital period in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing thrombolytic treatment.

Methods and Results

The study population consisted of 90 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis within 6h of the onset of symptoms. Left ventricular function was serially assessed by an echocardiographic asynergy score (before thrombolysis and pre-discharge). Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were also calculated. Coronary stenosis was evaluated by computer-assisted videodensitometric analysis at pre-discharge coronary angiography. Three subgroups were identified on the basis of left ventricular function changes: 25 patients (Group A) with regional myocardial improvement (echo score from 7·5±3·5 to 4·3±3·2), 51 (Group B) with no variation in echo score (4·8±2·7) and 14 (Group C) with myo-cardial regional worsening (echo score from 4·4±2·1 to 8·8±2·4). Group A patients exhibited a very high incidence of infarct-related artery patency (23/25 patients, 92%) vs 71% with unchanged (Group B) and 14% (Group C) with worsening regional left ventricular function (P<0·001). Subdivision of the study population on the basis of residual stenosis severity showed that a significant improvement in left ventricular function was present only in the subgroup with residual stenosis <75% (echo score from 5·2±3·4 to 3·6±2·9,P<0·001).

Conclusion

These results support the important role exerted by complete coronary patency after thrombolysis in inducing left ventricular function recovery, and the poor functional improvement in patients with incomplete coronary patency.

Key Words: Coronary patency • acute myocardial infarction • left ventricular function • quantitative coronary angiography

f1 Correspondence: Prof. Maria Penco, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Sanita’ Pubblica, Universita’ de L’Aquila, Via S. Sisto 22, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
W. Streb, M. Marciniak, P. Claus, A. Marciniak, M. McLaughlin, J. D'hooge, F. E. Rademakers, B. Bijnens, and G. R. Sutherland
Full or pressure limited reperfusion of an acute myocardial infarct results in a different wall thickness and deformation of the distal myocardium - implications for clinical reperfusion strategies
Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 458 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.