Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1999 20(14):1030-1038; doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1353
Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (65)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urban, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urban, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A randomized evaluation of early revascularization to treat shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The (Swiss) Multicenter Trial of Angioplasty for Shock—(S)MASH

UrbanP. f1, StaufferJ-C. , BleedD. , KhatchatrianN. , AmannW. , BertelO. , van den BrandM. , DanchinN. , KaufmannU. , MeierB. , MachecourtJ. , PfistererM. and (S)MASH investigators

revised October 1, 1998; accepted October 7, 1998

Abstract

Aim To test whether emergency revascularization improves survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction and shock.

Methods and Results Patients with acute myocardial infarction and early shock were randomized either to undergo emergency angiography, followed immediately by revascularization when indicated, or to receive initial medical management. In five of the nine participating centres, patients with shock but not randomized were entered in a registry. Only 55 patients could be randomized. Of the 32 patients in the invasive group, 30 (94%) underwent early angiography, 27 (84%) PTCA, and one (4%) CABG. Twenty-two (69%) died within 30 days in the invasive group vs 18/23 (78%) in the medically managed group (ns, RR=0·88, 95% confidence interval 0·6–1·2). Among the registry patients, 24/51 were excluded from randomization solely because of patient or physician preference for the invasive approach: 23 (96%) of them underwent emergency angiography, 21 (88%) PTCA, and 12 (50%) died within 30 days. Among the remaining registry patients (n=27) only nine (33%) underwent early angiography, nine (33%) PTCA and 20 (74%) died.

Conclusion We failed to demonstrate that emergency PTCA significantly improves survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction and early cardiogenic shock. Because the study was stopped prematurely, due to an insufficient patient inclusion rate, a clinically meaningful benefit of early reperfusion may have been missed.

Key Words: Angioplasty • myocardial infarction • resvascularization • shock • surgery

f1 Correspondence: Philip Urban MD, Cardiology Division, CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. R. Reynolds and J. S. Hochman
Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes
Circulation, February 5, 2008; 117(5): 686 - 697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. John, K. Liao, K. Lietz, F. Kamdar, M. Colvin-Adams, A. Boyle, L. Miller, and L. Joyce
Experience with the Levitronix CentriMag circulatory support system as a bridge to decision in patients with refractory acute cardiogenic shock and multisystem organ failure
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 351 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. V. Jeger, S. M. Harkness, K. Ramanathan, C. E. Buller, M. E. Pfisterer, L. A. Sleeper, J. S. Hochman, and for the SHOCK Investigators
Emergency revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock on admission: a report from the SHOCK trial and registry
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2006; 27(6): 664 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. C. Smith Jr, T. E. Feldman, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, M. J. Kern, S. B. King III, D. A. Morrison, W. W. O'Neill, H. V. Schaff, P. L. Whitlow, et al.
ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 216 - 235.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. C. Smith Jr, T. E. Feldman, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, M. J. Kern, S. B. King III, D. A. Morrison, W. W. O'Neill, H. V. Schaff, P. L. Whitlow, et al.
ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
Circulation, January 3, 2006; 113(1): 156 - 175.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. D. White, S. F. Assmann, T. A. Sanborn, A. K. Jacobs, J. G. Webb, L. A. Sleeper, C.-K. Wong, J. T. Stewart, P. E.G. Aylward, S.-C. Wong, et al.
Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results From the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) Trial
Circulation, September 27, 2005; 112(13): 1992 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
C. S. Duvernoy and E. R. Bates
Management of Cardiogenic Shock Attributable to Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Reperfusion Era
J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 188 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. E. Vist, K. B. Hagen, P J Devereaux, D. Bryant, D. T. Kristoffersen, and A. D. Oxman
Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome
BMJ, May 21, 2005; 330(7501): 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, S. Silber, P. Albertsson, F. F. Aviles, P. G. Camici, A. Colombo, C. Hamm, E. Jorgensen, J. Marco, J.-E. Nordrehaug, et al.
Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 804 - 847.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. P. Bouki, G. Pavlakis, and E. Papasteriadis
Management of Cardiogenic Shock Due to Acute Coronary Syndromes
Angiology, March 1, 2005; 56(2): 123 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
U. Zeymer, A. Vogt, R. Zahn, M. A Weber, U. Tebbe, M. Gottwik, T. Bonzel, J. Senges, K.-L. Neuhaus, and for the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologisch
Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK)
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2004; 25(4): 322 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
S. d. Graaf, M. Voskuil, and J. J. Piek
Cardiogenic Shock Complicating an Acute Myocardial Infarction: Conservative Treatment Versus Revascularization
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2003; 7(1): 99 - 103.
[PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
V. Menon and J. S Hochman
MANAGEMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(5): 531 - 537.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J. HAMPTON
Immediate angioplasty for the National Health Service?
Heart, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 241 - 242.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M.S. Marber and S.R. Redwood
The management of cardiogenic shock: can anything be learnt from registries?
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2001; 22(6): 444 - 445.
[PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
C.H. Davies
Revascularization for cardiogenic shock
QJM, February 1, 2001; 94(2): 57 - 67.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. W. Stevenson and R. L. Kormos
Mechanical cardiac support 2000: current applications and future trial design: June 15-16, 2000 Bethesda, Maryland
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 340 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H.D. White
Cardiogenic shock: a more aggressive approach is now warranted
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2000; 21(23): 1897 - 1901.
[PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S G Williams, D J Wright, and L B Tan
Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: towards evidence based medical practice
Heart, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 621 - 626.
[Full Text]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Early Revascularization for Acute MI with Shock
Journal Watch Cardiology, September 10, 1999; 1999(910): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. S. Hochman, L. A. Sleeper, J. G. Webb, T. A. Sanborn, H. D. White, J. D. Talley, C. E. Buller, A. K. Jacobs, J. N. Slater, J. Col, et al.
Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
N. Engl. J. Med., August 26, 1999; 341(9): 625 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.