Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1999 20(16):1166-1174; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1577
Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abrahamsson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dellborg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abrahamsson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dellborg, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Prognostic value of maximum ST-vector magnitude during the first 24h of vectorcardiographic monitoring in patients with unstable angina pectoris

P. Abrahamssona,f1, K. Andersena, P. Erikssona and M. Dellborga

a Clinical Experimental Research Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Göteborg, Sweden

revised February 8, 1999; accepted February 17, 1999 1999

Abstract

Aims To assess the prognostic importance of alternate ways of quantifying myocardial ischaemia by continuous ST analysis, the maximum ST vector magnitude and the area under the ST vector magnitude trend curve during the first 24h of continuous ST monitoring.

Methods and Results During a 22-month period from 1991 to 1993, 195 patients admitted to our CCU with suspected unstable angina pectoris, were included in the study. During the first 24h the patients were monitored for ischaemic episodes with computerized vectorcardiography, using a MIDA 1000 system. Twenty seven (14%) of the 195 patients died or had a non-fatal myocardial infarction within 1 year and the maximum ST vector magnitude among those patients was, on average, 201µV compared with 118 µV in patients who survived 1 year free of myocardial infarction (P<0·01). The area under the ST vector magnitude trend curve was, on average, 1598µVmin compared with 164µVmin (P<0·01). By multivariate analysis, the maximum ST vector magnitude emerged as a superior predictor of death or myocardial infarction, compared with the area under the ST vector magnitude trend curve and the number of ST vector magnitude and ST change vector magnitude episodes. The maximum ST vector magnitude and age were independent predictors of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction within 1 year.

Conclusion Maximum ST vector magnitude during the first 24h of vectorcardiographic monitoring seems to be a strong predictor of subsequent death or non-fatal myocardial infarction.

Key Words: Unstable angina pectoris, prognosis, vectorcardiography

f1 Correspondence: P. Abrahamsson, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset/Östra, 416 85 Göteborg, Sweden.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
L.A. Pierard
Evaluating risk in unstable angina: role of pharmacological stress echocardiography
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2000; 21(13): 1041 - 1043.
[PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
B. Lindahl
More is worse--ST-segment deviation in unstable coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 1999; 20(22): 1611 - 1612.
[PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.