Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1999 20(23):1731-1735; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1690
Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewsey, J.D
Right arrow Articles by Boddy, F.A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewsey, J.D
Right arrow Articles by Boddy, F.A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Comparing outcomes of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with coronary artery bypass grafting. Can routine health service data complement and enhance randomized controlled trials?

J.D Lewseya,f1, G.D Murrayb, A.H Leylanda and F.A Boddya

a Public Health Research Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
b Medical Statistics Unit, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K.

revised May 11, 1999; accepted May 12, 1999

Abstract

Aim To compare outcomes of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for a population stemming from routinely collected data, in order to assess the merits of such data sources as a complement, and possible enhancement, to randomized controlled trial results.

Methods and Results A population of Scottish patients were taken from a routine discharge summary and from this data source patients comparable to those from randomized controlled trial settings were identified. Between 1989 and 1995, 12238 pseudo randomized controlled trial patients were identified from the routine data set, of which 3714 (30·3%) received PTCA and 8524 (69·7%) received CABG. The baseline characteristics of the pseudo randomized controlled trial and randomized controlled trial patients were similar. The evidence from both the randomized controlled trials and routine data indicate that for 1 year follow-up the risk of cardiac death and/or non-fatal myocardial infarction is not significantly different between the two treatment groups.

Conclusion The outcomes expected of PTCA and CABG following trial evidence have been realized in the routine data which are representative of a complete, non-selective population. Due to the size of the routine data set it would be possible to set up hypotheses for potential subgroup effects at the outset.

Key Words: Coronary revascularization, routine data, randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis, subgroup analysis

f1 Correspondence: J. D. Lewsey, National Centre for Transcultural Oral Health, Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, University of London, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LD, U.K.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Garcia, K. Julier, L. Bestmann, A. Zollinger, L. K. von Segesser, T. Pasch, D. R. Spahn, and M. Zaugg
Preconditioning with sevoflurane decreases PECAM-1 expression and improves one-year cardiovascular outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2005; 94(2): 159 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R.T. van Domburg, J.J.M. Takkenberg, L.A. van Herwerden, A.C. Venema, and A.J.J.C. Bogers
Short-term and 5-year outcome after primary isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery: results of risk stratification in a bilocation center
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 733 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J.Z. Ayanian
Using administrative data to assess health care outcomes
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 1999; 20(23): 1689 - 1691.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.