Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1999 20(24):1783-1790; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1545
Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knight, C.J.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, K.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knight, C.J.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, K.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Stent implantation reduces restenosis in patients with suboptimal results following coronary angioplasty

C.J. Knighta,f1, N.P. Curzena, P.H. Grovesa, D.J. Patela, A.H. Goodallb, C. Wrighta, D. Clarkea, P.J. Oldershawa and K.M. Foxa

a Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, U.K.
b Division of Chemical Pathology, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital Trust, Leicester, U.K.

revised January 26, 1999; accepted February 3, 1999

Abstract

Background Primary intracoronary stenting reduces the rate of restenosis when compared with balloon angioplasty (PTCA) in selected patients. The strategy of PTCA followed by provisional stent placement for suboptimal PTCA results may be preferable to universal stenting but has not yet been tested in a randomized trial.

Methods An attempt was made to obtain an optimal result with PTCA alone in 143 patients. Stenting was required in 50 patients (35%) for significant coronary dissection or PTCA failure. In the remaining 93 patients, the angiographic result was assessed immediately using on-line quantitative coronary angiography and classified as either optimal (<15% residual stenosis) or suboptimal (≥15% residual stenosis). Sixteen patients (11%) had an optimal result from PTCA. The remaining 77 (54%) patients had a suboptimal result and were immediately randomized either to no further treatment or to the placement of a stent. The primary end-point was the rate of restenosis (>50% stenosis), assessed by quantitative coronary angiography, at 6 months.

Results Angiographic follow-up was completed in 132 patients. Restenosis occurred in 53 (36,69)% of patients with a suboptimal result randomized to PTCA alone compared with 24 (12,41)% of patients randomized to stent (P=0·023). There was no significant difference in minimal luminal diameter at follow-up between the randomized groups. The rate of restenosis was 14 (2,43)% in patients with an optimal PTCA result and 14 (5,28)% in those that required stenting.

Conclusions Optimal angiographic results following conventional PTCA are rare and the restenosis rate following suboptimal results is high. The strategy of stenting suboptimal results is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of stenosis.

Key Words: Angioplasty, stent, restenosis

f1 Correspondence: Dr Charles Knight, Department of Cardiology, London Chest Hospital, Bonner Road, London E2 9JX, U.K.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Schiele, N. Meneveau, M. Gilard, J. Boschat, P. Commeau, L. P. Ming, P. Sewoke, M.-F. Seronde, M. Mercier, S. Gupta, et al.
Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Stent: Immediate and 6-Month Results of the Multicenter, Randomized Balloon Equivalent to Stent Study (BEST)
Circulation, February 4, 2003; 107(4): 545 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. J. Cantor, E. D. Peterson, J. J. Popma, J. P. Zidar, M. H. Sketch Jr., J. E. Tcheng, and E. M. Ohman
Provisional stenting strategies: systematic overview and implications for clinical decision-making
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1142 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P.N. Ruygrok and M.W.I. Webster
Provisional vs primary stenting during percutaneous coronary intervention
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2000; 21(18): 1557 - 1557.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H.-J. Rupprecht and J. Meyer
A plea for provisional stenting
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 1999; 20(24): 1769 - 1770.
[PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. D. Reis, M. Roque, H. Dansky, J. T. Fallon, J. J. Badimon, C. Cordon-Cardo, S. J. Shiff, and E. A. Fisher
Sulindac inhibits neointimal formation after arterial injury in wild-type and apolipoprotein E-deficient mice
PNAS, November 7, 2000; 97(23): 12764 - 12769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.