Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1999 20(9):653-658; doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1237
Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Währborg, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Währborg, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery

1-year follow-up in the Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularization Investigation (CABRI) trial

P. Währborgf1

Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

revised July 20, 1998; accepted July 22, 1998

Abstract

Background

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have both been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Nine randomized studies comparing CABG and PTCA have delivered consistent results, with no significant differences in mortality between the methods, either in single or in multivessel coronary artery disease. An important outcome measurement after intervention is the patient’s subjective appraisal of the intervention. Results from the CABRI substudy on quality of life at 1 year follow-up are presented in this report.

Methods

CABRI is a multicentre, randomized, open comparison of patients assigned to either PTCA or CABG. Patients were recruited from 26 high volume European hospitals over a 53 month period starting in July 1988. A quality of life substudy was also set up, but participation was optional. Seven out of 26 centres took part in the study. One hundred and fifty-four (14·6%) out of the 1054 main study patients participated. Perceived health status was assessed at baseline and 1 year after revascularization by means of The Nottingham Health Profile and a set of 12 other questions.

Results

A significant improvement in quality of life in terms of the total score and in the Nottingham Health Profile for both groups, as compared with baseline, was found. A trend towards better outcome concerning energy was found favouring CABG. This trend might be due to the fact that the CABRI protocol permitted incomplete revascularization in the PTCA arm and did not exclude patients with totally occluded vessels.When adjusted for baseline differences, no difference in health-related quality of life at follow-up was found between the sexes, or between the PTCA and the CABG groups. A significant correlation was found between improvement in quality of life and severity of angina when adjusted for baseline values.

Conclusions

This study has shown that there is no general difference in health-related quality of life 1 year after bypass surgery or angioplasty; however, data presented are sug-gestive of a more favourable outcome in degree of perceived energy in the bypass group.

Key Words: Quality of life • coronary artery bypass grafting • percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

f1 Correspondence: Peter Währborg, Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. M. Bravata, A. L. Gienger, K. M. McDonald, V. Sundaram, M. V. Perez, R. Varghese, J. R. Kapoor, R. Ardehali, D. K. Owens, and M. A. Hlatky
Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Ann Intern Med, November 20, 2007; 147(10): 703 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
S. Gravely-Witte, V. De Gucht, W. Heiser, S. L. Grace, and T. Van Elderen
The impact of angina and cardiac history on health-related quality of life and depression in coronary heart disease patients
Chronic Illness, March 1, 2007; 3(1): 66 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. Szygula-Jurkiewicz, M. Zembala, K. Wilczek, R. Wojnicz, and L. Polonski
Health related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. 12-month follow up
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 882 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. M.G. Legrand, P. W. Serruys, F. Unger, B. A. van Hout, M. C.M. Vrolix, G. M.P. Fransen, T. T. Nielsen, P. K. Paulsen, R. S. Gomes, J. M.G. de Queiroz e Melo, et al.
Three-Year Outcome After Coronary Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Multivessel Disease
Circulation, March 9, 2004; 109(9): 1114 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. Zhang, E. M. Mahoney, R. H. Stables, J. Booth, F. Nugara, J. A. Spertus, and W. S. Weintraub
Disease-Specific Health Status After Stent-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: One-Year Results From the Stent or Surgery Trial
Circulation, October 7, 2003; 108(14): 1694 - 1700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. S. Rumsfeld, D. J. Magid, M. E. Plomondon, J. Sacks, W. Henderson, M. Hlatky, G. Sethi, D. A. Morrison, and Veterans Affairs Angina With Extremely Serious Ope
Health-related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass surgery in high-risk patients with medically refractory ischemia
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 21, 2003; 41(10): 1732 - 1738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M.S. Barakate, J.M. Hemli, C.F. Hughes, P.G. Bannon, and M.D. Horton
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after initially successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): a review of 17 years experience
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 23(2): 179 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
O. Ekre, T. Eliasson, H. Norrsell, P. Wahrborg, and C. Mannheimer
Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation and coronary artery bypass grafting on quality of life and survival in the ESBY study
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2002; 23(24): 1938 - 1945.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
B Brorsson, S J Bernstein, R H Brook, and L Werko
Quality of life of patients with chronic stable angina before and four years after coronary revascularisation compared with a normal population
Heart, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 140 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
R. Ecochard, C. Colin, M. Rabilloud, G. de Gevigney, D. Cao, C. Ducreux, F. Delahaye, and PRIMA group
Indicators of myocardial dysfunction and quality of life, one year after acute infarction
Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2001; 3(5): 561 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.