Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2000 21(20):1690-1697; doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2241
Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hildick-Smith, D.J.R
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, L.M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hildick-Smith, D.J.R
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, L.M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Inoue balloon mitral valvuloplasty: long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of a predominantly unfavourable population

D.J.R Hildick-Smithf1, G.J Taylor and L.M Shapiro

Cardiac Unit, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, U.K.

Received March 20, 2000; accepted March 27, 2000

Abstract

Aims To assess long-term outcome in a typical Western population of predominantly unfavourable patients undergoing Inoue balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Outcome amongst patients has only been undertaken in the medium term. Long-term echocardiographic data in particular are scarce.

Methods Inoue mitral valvuloplasty was attempted in 106 patients. There were six technical failures; the procedure was therefore completed in 100 patients, who underwent annual clinical and echocardiographic follow-up.

Results Patients were aged 63·5±10·3 years. 82% were female. Unfavourable characteristics included age >65 (52%), NYHA class III or IV (87%), ≥1 significant co-morbidity (63%), atrial fibrillation (82%), previous surgical commissurotomy (25%) and echocardiographic score >8 (59%, mean 8·9±2·1). Mitral valve area increased from 0·98±0·23 to 1·54±0·31cm2. There were three major complications. Post-procedure, symptoms improved in 88% of patients. Haemodynamic success (mitral valve area increase >50%, final mitral valve area >1·5cm2, mitral regurgitation ≤grade 2) was achieved in 61% of cases. Mean follow-up was 4·3±1·4 years. Survival was 97%, 88% and 82% at 1, 3 and 6 years. Event-free survival (freedom from death, mitral valve replacement or repeat valvuloplasty) was 96%, 82% and 56% at 1, 3 and 6 years. Freedom from restenosis (loss of >50% gain in mitral valve area, mitral valve area <1·5cm2) was 98%, 92% and 75% at 1, 3 and 6 years. Pre-procedural predictors of event-free survival were male sex, absence of co-morbidities, lower echocardiographic score and smaller left atrial diameter.

Conclusions In a Western population with predominantly unfavourable characteristics for mitral valvuloplasty, long-term outcome post-procedure is reasonable. A moderate increase in mitral valve area can be achieved at low procedural risk, and the subsequent rate of restenosis is low. Nonetheless, 6 years after the procedure, half of the patients will have required further intervention or died. For fitter patients willing to accept significant operative risk, mitral valve replacement remains a valuable alternative.

Key Words: Mitral valvuloplasty, inoui balloon, outcome measures, long-term follow up

f1 Correspondence: David Hildick-Smith, Cardiology Registrar, Cardiac Unit, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB3 8RE, U.K.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
B D Prendergast, T R D Shaw, B Iung, A Vahanian, and D B Northridge
Contemporary criteria for the selection of patients for percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty
Heart, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 401 - 404.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.