Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2001 22(13):1111-1118; doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2444
Copyright © 2001 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baessler, A
Right arrow Articles by Schunkert, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baessler, A
Right arrow Articles by Schunkert, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Long-term effects of in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation on the cardiac risk profile. A case-control study in pairs of siblings with myocardial infarction

A Baesslera, C Hengstenberga, S Holmera, M Fischera, B Mayera, U Hubauera, G Kleinb, G Rieggera and H Schunkerta,f1

a Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II der Universität Regensburg, Germany
b Klinik Höhenried, Bernried, Germany

revised September 5, 2000; accepted September 6, 2000

Abstract

Aims In the general population, measures for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction are poorly utilized. Our aim was therefore to analyse whether post-myocardial infarction in-hospital rehabilitation and education programmes improve the subsequent utilization of preventive strategies.

Methods and Results We screened 93500 patient charts in cardiac rehabilitation clinics to identify a myocardial infarction patient with a sibling, who likewise had a myocardial infarction prior to the age of 60 years but was discordant with respect to the participation in cardiac in-hospital rehabilitation. In 92 such sibling pairs the coronary risk profile was studied by standardized questionnaire, biochemical measurements and physical examination. At the time of the acute myocardial infarction, both groups showed an equal risk factor distribution. However, at follow-up (on average 5·5 years after myocardial infarction), rehabilitation-siblings presented with significantly lower systolic (137±2 vs 150±3mmHg,P <0·01) and diastolic blood pressure (82±1 vs 89±1mmHg, P<0·01). Antihypertensive drug therapy resulted more often in effective (≤140/90mmHg) control of blood pressure (58% vs 29%, P<0·01). Blood lipid levels and smoking prevalence tended to be lower in rehabilitation-siblings. Significantly fewer rehabilitation-siblings presented with two or more modifiable risk factors (OR 0·36 (CI 0·17–0·76);P<0·01). There was a strong tendency towards fewer recurrent cardiac events (re-myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting) during follow-up in rehabilitation-siblings (OR 0·57 (CI 0·31–1·04);P=0·07).

Conclusion An in-hospital programme for cardiac rehabilitation may successfully encourage therapy to modify risk factors and thus enhance the long-term implementation of secondary prevention.

Key Words: Myocardial infarction, secondary prevention, cardiac rehabilitation, coronary risk factors, sibling pairs

f1 Correspondence: Prof. Dr H. Schunkert, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Universität Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W.W. Klein
Secondary prevention: is inpatient rehabilitation effective or are lifestyle changes to be replaced by drugs?
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2001; 22(13): 1063 - 1064.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.