Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2001 22(17):1618-1625; doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2577
Copyright © 2001 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kouakam, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kacet, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kouakam, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kacet, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Long-term follow-up of children and adolescents with syncope; predictor of syncope recurrence

C. Kouakama,f1, G. Vaksmannb, E. Pachya, D. Lacroixa, C. Reyb and S. Kaceta

a Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
b Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Lille, Lille, France

revised December 12, 2000; accepted December 14, 2000

Abstract

Background Previous studies have shown that investigation by tilt testing is very appropriate in paediatrics, but the characteristics of children and adolescents who are at high risk of recurrent syncope, once the diagnosis is established, remain unclear. This study was set up to analyse the risk factors attributed to syncope recurrence in paediatric patients.

Methods One hundred and one children and adolescents aged 7 to 18 years, undergoing a tilt test for recurrent syncope, were studied. They were subsequently followed-up in clinic visits with a final interview at the clinic or by telephone at the end of the follow-up period.

Results A head-up tilt test elicited syncope or pre-syncope in 67 children. The positive responses included vasovagal syncope in 58 patients and psychogenic syncope in nine patients. Gender, age, number of pre-tilt test syncopal episodes or duration of symptoms made no difference to children with positive or negative tilt test results. Following the tilt test, 43 of 67 children with a positive tilt test were treated empirically. No treatment was prescribed for the remaining 24 with a positive test, or for those with a negative tilt test. There were no differences between treated and untreated children with respect to the number of pre-tilt test syncopes, duration of symptoms and duration of follow-up. Follow-up data were available in 97 children. During a mean follow-up of 46±28 months, syncope recurred in 31 children (32%). The recurrence rate was similar between positive and negative tilt test groups (22/66 vs 9/31, respectively;P=ns), as well as between treated and untreated children (14/43 vs 8/23, respectively;P=ns). When comparing syncope-free children at follow-up in a univariate analysis, children with recurrent syncope reported a greater number of historical syncopal spells (7±8 vs 3±3,P =0·01). In addition linear correlation (r=0·6, 95% CI 0·47 to 0·72,P <0·0001) was significant between the number of historical syncope episodes and the risk of recurrent syncope.

Conclusions These findings suggest that the risk of syncope recurrence for children and adolescents with such a history is not correlated to the tilt test result or prophylactic treatment. The number of historical syncopal spells is, however, predictive.

Key Words: Syncope, head-up tilt test, prognosis, follow-up study

f1 Correspondence: Claude Kouakam, MD, Service de Cardiologie A, Hôpital Cardiologique, Boulevard du Pr J. Leclercq—CHR & U 59037 Lille Cedex, France.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. P. Vlahos, M. Tzoufi, C. S. Katsouras, T. Barka, I. Sionti, L. K. Michalis, A. Siamopoulou, and T. M. Kolettis
Provocation of Neurocardiogenic Syncope During Head-up Tilt Testing in Children: Comparison Between Isoproterenol and Nitroglycerin
Pediatrics, February 1, 2007; 119(2): e419 - e425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. N. Theodorakis, D. Leftheriotis, E. G. Livanis, P. Flevari, G. Karabela, N. Aggelopoulou, and D. Th. Kremastinos
Fluoxetine vs. propranolol in the treatment of vasovagal syncope: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Europace, March 1, 2006; 8(3): 193 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
S. O. Sapin
Autonomic Syncope in Pediatrics: A Practice-Oriented Approach to Classification, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 17 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Rossano, B. Bloemers, N. Sreeram, S. Balaji, and M. J. Shah
Efficacy of Implantable Loop Recorders in Establishing Symptom-Rhythm Correlation in Young Patients With Syncope and Palpitations
Pediatrics, September 1, 2003; 112(3): e228 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C.M. Seifer and R.A. Kenny
Head-up tilt testing in children
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 1968 - 1971.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.