Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2001 22(9):751-761; doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2308
Copyright © 2001 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Hout, B.A.
Right arrow Articles by Simoons, M.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Hout, B.A.
Right arrow Articles by Simoons, M.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cost-effectiveness of HMG coenzyme reductase inhibitors. Whom to treat?

B.A. van Houta and M.L. Simoonsb

a Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
b Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

revised June 26, 2000; accepted June 28, 2000

Abstract

Aims Treatment guidelines have been developed for both ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ prevention of coronary heart disease. These should consider both the efficacy as well as the costs of such treatment, particularly the costs of treatment with HMG co-enzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins). In the context of guideline development in The Netherlands, the cost effectiveness of treatment with statins was analysed.

Methods Following a modelling approach, cost effectiveness was analysed as a function of a patient's initial risk for new coronary heart disease events, combining results from 4S, CARE, LIPID, WOSCOPS and AFCAPS with Dutch cost data. For each sex and age group, an estimate was made of the level of cardiovascular risks that might correspond to a cost-effectiveness ratio under NLG 40000 (Euro 18151) per life year gained.

Results If the 10-year risk of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death was estimated at 9% (AFCAPS/TexCAPS), 20% (WOSCOPS), 36% (CARE) 36% (LIPID) and 47% (4S), cost effectiveness was estimated at Euro 51400, Euro 26013, Euro 9970, Euro 8028 and Euro 6695. The arbitrary threshold of NLG 40000 (approximately Euro 18000) was achieved at a 10 year coronary heart disease event risk ranging from 19% to 26% for different age groups. Assuming the effectiveness of statin treatment decreased with age, a 10-year risk, corresponding to Euro 18000, varied from 11% (under age 30) to 41% (over age 80). Patients at higher risk levels should be considered for statin therapy.

Conclusions Treatment costs for primary or secondary prevention are determined predominantly by the costs of statin drugs. The developed model allows comparison of cost effectiveness of statin therapy across a wide range of subjects with or without coronary heart disease. The consensus committee in the Netherlands postulated that drug therapy should be considered in subjects with or without coronary heart disease in which cost-effectiveness is similar. Such groups can be identified using the presented model. When cost effectiveness ratios up to Euro 18000 per life year gained are deemed acceptable, statin treatment should be considered in most patients with known cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention), and in a limited group of subjects who are at high risk of developing coronary heart disease (primary prevention).

Key Words: HMG coenzyme reductase inhibitors, cost effectiveness, treatment guidelines


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
J. Nexoe, P. A. Halvorsen, and I. S. Kristiansen
Review Article: Critiques of the risk concept -- valid or not?
Scand J Public Health, December 1, 2007; 35(6): 648 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. A. Halvorsen, R. Selmer, and I. S. Kristiansen
Different Ways to Describe the Benefits of Risk-Reducing Treatments: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med, June 19, 2007; 146(12): 848 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
O. H Franco, E. W Steyerberg, A. Peeters, and L. Bonneux
Effectiveness calculation in economic analysis: the case of statins for cardiovascular disease prevention.
J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2006; 60(10): 839 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
O. H Franco, E. W Steyerberg, and C. de Laet
The polypill: at what price would it become cost effective?
J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2006; 60(3): 213 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
O. H Franco, A. Peeters, C. W N Looman, and L. Bonneux
Cost effectiveness of statins in coronary heart disease
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2005; 59(11): 927 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
H.T. Ong
The statin studies: from targeting hypercholesterolaemia to targeting the high-risk patient
QJM, August 1, 2005; 98(8): 599 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A Jain, V Wadehra, and A D Timmis
Management of stable angina
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2003; 79(932): 332 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
O. Faergeman
Estimation and reduction of cardiovascular risk in old people
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2002; 23(4): 261 - 263.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R.V. Luepker
Cholesterol reduction: What can we afford?
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2001; 22(9): 720 - 721.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.