Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2002 23(18):1465-1470; doi:10.1053/euhj.2002.3260
Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teo, N.
Right arrow Articles by Adam, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teo, N.
Right arrow Articles by Adam, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Treatment of superior vena cava obstruction secondary to pacemaker wires with balloon venoplasty and insertion of metallic stents

N. Teoa,f1, T. Sabharwala, E. Rowlandb, P. Curryc and A. Adama

a Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
b Department of Cardiology, St Georges Hospital, London, UK
c Department of Cardiology, London Bridge Hospital, London, UK

revised March 19, 2002; accepted March 20, 2002

Abstract

Aims Pacemaker wires can result in stenosis of the superior vena cava and other central veins. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of treating stenoses of the superior vena cava (SVC) and central veins with balloon venoplasty and metallic stent insertion in the presence of cardiac pacemaker wires.

Methods and Results Three patients were referred to the department after developing symptomatic SVC obstruction following implantation of a cardiac pacemaker several years earlier. They were examined with duplex ultrasound and venography, which revealed significant stenoses of the central veins. These patients subsequently underwent endovascular treatment which involved balloon dilation and stent insertion. The treatment was successful in all three patients, without any complications. Long-term patency of up to 4 years is recorded. No pacemaker function dysfunction was encountered.

Conclusion SVC stenting is safe and effective in patients who develop the SVC obstruction after cardiac pacemaker insertion. Copyright 2002 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Key Words: Cardiac pacemaker, superior vena cava stenosis, balloon venoplasty, venous stenting

f1 Correspondence: Dr Ngee Teo, Department of Radiology, St Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. Oshima, T. Takahashi, S. Ishikawa, T. Nagashima, K. Hirai, and Y. Morishita
Superior Vena Cava Rupture Caused During Balloon Dilation for Treatment of SVC Syndrome Due to Repetitive Catheter Ablation: A Case Report
Angiology, March 1, 2006; 57(2): 247 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EuropaceHome page
A. Kostopoulou, E. Sbarouni, E. G. Livanis, G. N. Theodorakis, and D. Kremastinos
Superior vena cava syndrome and syncope in an implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipient
Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(3): 205 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.