Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
The value of ECG and echocardiography during stress testing for identifying systemic endothelial dysfunction and epicardial artery stenosis
a Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical University, Szeged, Hungary
b Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Canada
c Cardiology Division, Mestre Hospital, Italy
d Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
revised January 22, 2001; accepted January 23, 2001
Abstract
Background In the stress imaging era, ECG positivity is regarded as a frequent source of false-positive responses. However, it is known that normal coronary arteries frequently coexist with abnormal endothelial function in patients with chest pain.
Aim To evaluate the anatomical coronary epicardial, and functional systemic endothelial determinants of wall motion and electrocardiographic responses during stress testing.
Method Sixty-eight in-hospital patients with chest pain syndrome, no previous myocardial infarction, and off nitrate therapy at the time of testing underwent, on different days, in random order and within 1 month: (1) stress ECG echo testing (with dipyridamole in 43, dobutamine in 3, and exercise in 22 patients); (2) coronary angiography; (3) endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery during reactive hyperaemia using high-resolution ultrasound. Criteria of positivity were: ST segment depression >0·1mm in the stress ECG; regional dysfunction >2 segments demonstrated by stressecho; diameter reduction >50% on coronary angiography; and <5% flow-mediated dilation as revealed by endothelial function.
Results Significant coronary artery disease was present in 39 patients, and was predicted on multivariate analysis by stress-induced wall motion abnormalities (OR=108.8; 95% CI=8·51389·4, P=0·0003), but not by either ST segment depression (P=0·13; OR=0·47; 95% CI=0·71·3) or reduced flow-mediated dilation (P=0·81; OR=0·87; 95% CI=0·272·8). Abnormal flow-mediated dilation was present in 53 patients (78%), and was predicted by stress-induced ST segment depression (P=0·023; OR=6·2; 95% CI=1·330·5), but not by either stress echo positivity (P=0·66; OR=0·77; 95% CI=0·23 to 2·5) or angiographically assessed coronary artery disease. There was no correlation between flow-mediated dilation and extent of coronary artery disease as assessed by the angiographic Duke score (from 0=normal to 100=most severe disease): r=0·13, P=0·91.
Conclusion Epicardial coronary artery anatomy affects wall motion abnormalities, and systemic endothelial dysfunction affects ST segment depression during stress. However, echocardiographic positivity is unrelated to endothelial dysfunction, and electrocardiographic positivity is an inaccurate predictor of coronary stenosis. An integration of ECG and functional markers is warranted in the stress testing lab.
Key Words: Stress echocardiography, electrocardiography, endothelium, ultrasound
f1 Correspondence: Eugenio Picano, MD, PhD, FESC, Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica, CNRVia Moruzzi, 1 56126 Pisa, Italy.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. Chuang, B. A. Coull, A. Zanobetti, H. Suh, J. Schwartz, P. H. Stone, A. Litonjua, F. E. Speizer, and D. R. Gold Particulate Air Pollution as a Risk Factor for ST-Segment Depression in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, September 23, 2008; 118(13): 1314 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sicari, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Evangelista, J. Kasprzak, P. Lancellotti, D. Poldermans, J.-U. Voigt, J. L. Zamorano, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC) Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 415 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rigo, R. Sicari, S. Gherardi, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, L. Cortigiani, and E. Picano The additive prognostic value of wall motion abnormalities and coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echo Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 79 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cortigiani, F. Rigo, S. Gherardi, R. Sicari, M. Galderisi, F. Bovenzi, and E. Picano Additional Prognostic Value of Coronary Flow Reserve in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With Negative Dipyridamole Stress Echocardiography by Wall Motion Criteria J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1354 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nasir, R. F. Redberg, M. J. Budoff, E. Hui, W. S. Post, and R. S. Blumenthal Utility of Stress Testing and Coronary Calcification Measurement for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease in Women Arch Intern Med, August 9, 2004; 164(15): 1610 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mora, R. F. Redberg, Y. Cui, M. K. Whiteman, J. A. Flaws, A. R. Sharrett, and R. S. Blumenthal Ability of Exercise Testing to Predict Cardiovascular and All-Cause Death in Asymptomatic Women: A 20-Year Follow-up of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study JAMA, September 24, 2003; 290(12): 1600 - 1607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Preda Differentiation between endothelial dysfunction and epicardial coronary artery stenosis with the aid of stress ECG and echocardiography. A novel return of the old ECG! Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2002; 23(20): 1561 - 1562. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





