Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Non-contact mapping to guide catheter ablation of untolerated ventricular tachycardia
a Institute of Cardiology, University of Milan, IRCCS, Centro Cardiologico Fondazione I. Monzino Milan
b Department of Heart Sciences, Ospedale S. Camillo, Rome, Italy
Received March 14, 2001; accepted July 25, 2001
Abstract
Aims The role of a novel non-contact mapping system (ESI 3000, Endocardial Solutions) to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation of untolerated ventricular tachycardia was investigated in 17 patients; 11 with prior myocardial infarction, three with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, and three with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Methods Twenty-seven monomorphic ventricular tachycardias were induced (mean cycle 320±60ms, range 230450ms), mapped for 1520s, and terminated by overdrive pacing or DC shock. Off-line analysis of isopotential activation mapping was performed to identify the diastolic pathway and/or the exit point of the ventricular tachycardia reentry circuit. Radiofrequency current was applied to create a line of block across the diastolic pathway or around the exit point.
Results All 27 ventricular tachycardias were mapped with the non-contact system. The endocardial exit point (7±15ms before QRS onset) was defined in 21/21 postinfarction ventricular tachycardias, in 3/3 arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and in 1/3 idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardias, respectively. The diastolic pathway (earliest endocardial diastolic activity: 65±49ms before QRS onset) was identified in 17/21 postinfarction ventricular tachycardias, in 1/3 arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and in 1/3 idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardias, respectively. Catheter ablation was performed in 25/27 ventricular tachycardias (93%) in 15/17 patients (88%): 16/25 ventricular tachycardias (64%) were successfully ablated in 10/17 patients (59%). Catheter ablation was not performed in two patients or proved unsuccessful in five patients. At a follow-up of 15±5 months, there was no recurrence of documented ventricular tachycardia in all 10 patients with successful catheter ablation; in two of them a previously non-documented ventricular tachycardia occurred. A high recurrence of ventricular tachycardia was observed in patients with a failed procedure (5/7: 71%). No major complication or death occurred.
Conclusions Non-contact mapping can be effectively used to map and guide radiofrequency catheter ablation of untolerated ventricular tachycardias. Given the favourable acute and clinical long-term results, this approach proves to be more effective in patients with postinfarction ventricular tachycardias, in comparison to patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Key Words: Non-contact mapping, ventricular tachycardia, radiofrequency catheter ablation
f1 Correspondence: Paolo Della Bella, MD, Institute of Cardiology, University of Milan, Centro Cardiologico, IRCCS, Via Parea, 420138 Milano, Italy.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Carbucicchio, M. Santamaria, N. Trevisi, G. Maccabelli, F. Giraldi, G. Fassini, S. Riva, M. Moltrasio, M. Cireddu, F. Veglia, et al. Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in a Prospective Single-Center Study Circulation, January 29, 2008; 117(4): 462 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kriebel, J. P. Saul, H. Schneider, M. Sigler, and T. Paul Noncontact Mapping and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Fast and Hemodynamically Unstable Ventricular Tachycardia After Surgical Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 27, 2007; 50(22): 2162 - 2168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Stevenson and K. Soejima Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2750 - 2760. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. U. Klemm, R. Ventura, D. Steven, C. Johnsen, T. Rostock, B. Lutomsky, T. Risius, T. Meinertz, and S. Willems Catheter Ablation of Multiple Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction Guided by Combined Contact and Noncontact Mapping Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2697 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. De Ponti and J. A. Salerno-Uriarte Non-fluoroscopic mapping systems for electrophysiology: the 'tool or toy' dilemma after 10 years Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2006; 27(10): 1134 - 1136. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Della Bella, S. Riva, G. Fassini, F. Giraldi, M. Berti, C. Klersy, and N. Trevisi Incidence and significance of pleomorphism in patients with postmyocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia: Acute and long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2004; 25(13): 1127 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Della Bella and N. Trevisi Catheter ablation: is it good for all postinfarction ventricular tachycardias? Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2002; 23(21): 1645 - 1647. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


