Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2003 24(18):1630-1639; doi:10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00308-7
Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desideri, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desideri, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Regular Articles

Cost of strategies after myocardial infarction (COSTAMI)

A multicentre, international, randomized trial for cost-effective discharge after uncomplicated myocardial infarction

Alessandro Desideria,*, Paolo Maria Fiorettib, Lauro Cortigianic, Dario Gregorid, Claudio Colettae, Carlo Vignaf, Francesco Totag, Riccardo Rambaldih, Jeroen Baxi, Leopoldo Celegonj, Riccardo Bigik and Eugenio Picanol on behalf of the COSTAMI (Cost of Strategies After Myocardial Infarction) Trial Investigators

a Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
b IRCAB Foundation, Udine, Italy
c Campo di Marte Hospital, Lucca, Italy
d IRCAB Foundation, Udine, Italy
e Santo Spirito Hospital, Roma, Italy
f IRCCS General Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
g General Hospital, Bari, Italy
h General Hospital, Bentivoglio, Italy
i University Medical Center, Leiden,The Netherlands
j Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
k Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
l CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy

* Corresponding author: Alessandro Desideri, MD, FESC, FACC, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, S. Giacomo Hospital, 31033 Castelfranco Veneto (TV), Italy. Tel.: +39-0423-732300; fax: +39-0423-732301
E-mail address: aldesi{at}tin.it

Received 17 February 2003; revised 9 May 2003; accepted 21 May 2003

Aims Risk stratification after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction is mostly applied by either symptom-limited post discharge exercise electrocardiography or pre-discharge submaximal exercise test. Aim of the present study was to determine if early pharmacological stress echocardiography and discharge within 24 hours of the test in cases without induced myocardial ischemia leads to lower costs and similar clinical outcome during 1 year follow up when compared to clinical evaluation and exercise electrocardiography after discharge.

Methods and results Four-hundred fifty-eight patients from 10 participating centers with a recent uncomplicated myocardial infarction were randomized to pharmacological stress echocardiography on day 3–5 followed by early discharge in the case of negative test result (early discharge strategy) (n=233) or clinical evaluation with hospital discharge on day 7–9 and symptom-limited post-discharge exercise electrocardiography at 2–4 weeks after myocardial infarction (usual care strategy) (n=225). At 1 year follow up there were 63 events (4 deaths, 9 non fatal reinfarctions, 50 chest pains requiring hospitalization) in patients randomized to early discharge, and 69events (6 deaths, 13 reinfarctions, 50 chest pains requiring hospitalization) in usual care (p=ns). Total median individual costs calculated on the basis of hospitalizations, investigations and interventions during 1 year follow up were 3561 for early discharge strategy vs 3850 for usual care strategy (p<0.05).

Conclusions Early pharmacological stress echocardiography followed by early discharge in case of negative test result gives similar clinical outcome and lower costs after uncomplicated myocardial infarction than clinical evaluation and delayed post-discharge symptom-limited exercise electrocardiography.

Key Words: Myocardial Infarction • early discharge • cost-benefit analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Early hospital discharge after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: are further improvements possible?
Daniel B Mark and L. Kristin Newby
EHJ 2003 24: 1613-1615. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
A Desideri, P M Fioretti, L Cortigiani, G Trocino, C Astarita, D Gregori, J Bax, J Velasco, L Celegon, R Bigi, et al.
Pre-discharge stress echocardiography and exercise ECG for risk stratification after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: results of the COSTAMI-II (cost of strategies after myocardial infarction) trial
Heart, February 1, 2005; 91(2): 146 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. B Mark and L. K. Newby
Early hospital discharge after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: are further improvements possible?
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2003; 24(18): 1613 - 1615.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.