Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2003 24(20):1843-1847; doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2003.07.008
Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, G. J
Right arrow Articles by Ridker, P. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blake, G. J
Right arrow Articles by Ridker, P. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Clinical research

Effect of pravastatin on LDL particle concentration as determined by NMR spectroscopy: a substudy of a randomized placebo controlled trial

Gavin J Blakeb,*, Michelle A Albertb, Nader Rifaia and Paul M Ridkerb

a Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
b Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

* Corresponding author: Dr Gavin Blake, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston MA 02115-6110, USA. Tel.: +1-617-732-8777; fax: +1617-734-1508
E-mail address: gblake{at}partners.org

Received 24 March 2003; revised 17 July 2003; accepted 31 July 2003

Abstract

Aim Recent data suggests that LDL particle concentration, as determined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, may be associated with cardiovascular risk. We sought to determine the effect of randomization to pravastatin therapy on LDL particle concentration-NMR, among a primary prevention population.

Methods and results LDL particle concentration-NMR, LDL size-NMR, and standard chemical lipid parameters were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks among 500 individuals without overt coronary disease randomly allocated to pravastatin 40mg (n=256) or placebo (n=244). Randomization to pravastatin therapy caused a 19% reduction in median LDL particle concentration-NMR at 12 weeks, as compared to a 4.2% increase among those randomized to placebo (P<0.001 for pravastatin group compared to placebo). Pravastatin therapy caused a median 24.9% reduction in LDL cholesterol measured chemically compared to a 0.9% increase in the placebo group (P<0.001). Pravastatin therapy did not cause a significant change in median LDL size-NMR (0.5% increase in pravastatin group vs 0.0% in placebo group; P=0.25). The change in LDL particle concentration with pravastatin correlated inversely with baseline LDL size (r=–0.24; P<0.001) such that the largest reduction in LDL particle concentration-NMR was among those with the smallest LDL size-NMR at baseline (median% change =21.4% for tertile 1 of LDL size, 19.9% for tertile 2, and 16.5% for tertile 3; P=0.03). In contrast, pravastatin-induced changes in LDL cholesterol did not correlate with baseline LDL size-NMR (r=–0.05; P=0.47).

Conclusion Among individuals without overt hyperlipidemia or known coronary artery disease, randomized allocation to pravastatin (40mg) therapy for 12 weeks caused a reduction in LDL particle concentration-NMR, the magnitude of which was dependent on baseline LDL size-NMR.

Key Words: LDL particle concentration • Lipoproteins • Statin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
M. Rizzo and K. Berneis
Low-density lipoprotein size and cardiovascular risk assessment
QJM, January 1, 2006; 99(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.