Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2003 24(4):356-365; doi:10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00302-0
Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Opitz, C.F
Right arrow Articles by Ewert, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Opitz, C.F
Right arrow Articles by Ewert, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Assessment of the vasodilator response in primary pulmonary hypertension

Comparing prostacyclin and iloprost administered by either infusion or inhalation

C.F Opitza,*,1, R Wenselb,1, M Bettmannb, R Schaffarczykb, M Linscheidc, R Hetzerb and R Ewertb

a Department of Cardiology, DRK-Kliniken Westend, Medizinische Klinik II, Spandauer Damm 130,14050 Berlin, Germany
b Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Berlin, Germany
c Department of Chemistry, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

Received February 11, 2002; accepted April 17, 2002 * Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-30-3035-4305; fax: +49-30-3035-4309
c.opitz{at}drk-kliniken-bln.de

Aims To directly compare the differential effects of oxygen, prostacyclin and iloprost (aerosolized and intravenous) in primary pulmonary hypertension.

Methods and results Twenty-one patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension underwent right heart catheterization following oxygen inhalation, inhalation of aerosolized iloprost, intravenous prostacyclin or intravenous iloprost. The stability of the iloprost solution was tested for up to 4 weeks. Oxygen slightly decreased pulmonary vascular resistance. Intravenous prostacyclin (7.2±3.4ngkg–1min–1) reduced pulmonary (1772±844 vs 1325±615dynscm–5, ) and systemic vascular resistance, and arterial and right atrial pressure, while cardiac output increased. Iloprost inhalation diminished pulmonary (1813±827 vs 1323±614dynscm–5, ) and systemic vascular resistance, and pulmonary artery (58±12 vs 50±12mmHg,) and right atrial pressure, while cardiac output increased. With intravenous iloprost (1.2±0.5ngkg–1min–1, ) a decrease in pulmonary (2202±529 vs 1515±356dynscm–5, ) and systemic vascular resistance and right atrialpressure occurred while cardiac output increased. Iloprost solution remained stable for 33 days while losing <10% (4°C) of its active drug concentration.

Conclusions Intravenous iloprost and prostacyclin have very similar haemodynamic profiles. In contrast, only inhaled iloprost exerted selective pulmonary vasodilation, reducing pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary artery pressure withoutsystemic vasodilation. The longer half-life and extended stability despite lower costs render iloprost an attractive alternative to chronic prostacyclin treatment in primary pulmonary hypertension.

Key Words: Pulmonary hypertension • Prostaglandin • Prostacyclin • Inhaled iloprost


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Pulmonary arterial hypertension and the vasoconstrictive factor: is there still a role for vasodilator testing?
J.Simon R Gibbs, John Wharton, and Martin R Wilkins
EHJ 2003 24: 297-298. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
J. D. Edelman
Clinical Presentation, Differential Diagnosis, and Vasodilator Testing of Pulmonary Hypertension
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2007; 11(2): 110 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
H.-H. Hsu, J.-S. Chen, Y.-S. Chen, W.-J. Ko, S.-W. Kuo, and Y.-C. Lee
Short-term intravenous iloprost for treatment of reperfusion lung oedema after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy
Thorax, May 1, 2007; 62(5): 459 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. F. Opitz, R. Wensel, J. Winkler, M. Halank, L. Bruch, F.-X. Kleber, G. Hoffken, S. D. Anker, A. Negassa, S. B. Felix, et al.
Clinical efficacy and survival with first-line inhaled iloprost therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2005; 26(18): 1895 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
S. E Baker and R. H. Hockman
Inhaled Iloprost in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2005; 39(7): 1265 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
T. Nagaoka, K. A. Fagan, S. A. Gebb, K. G. Morris, T. Suzuki, H. Shimokawa, I. F. McMurtry, and M. Oka
Inhaled Rho Kinase Inhibitors Are Potent and Selective Vasodilators in Rat Pulmonary Hypertension
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2005; 171(5): 494 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. B. Badesch, S. H. Abman, G. S. Ahearn, R. J. Barst, D. C. McCrory, G. Simonneau, and V. V. McLaughlin
Medical Therapy For Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1_suppl): 35S - 62S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.