Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2003 24(9):838-844; doi:10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00828-X
Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norhammar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norhammar, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Regular Articles

Under utilisation of evidence-based treatment partial explanation for the unfavourable prognosis in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction

Anna Norhammara,*, Klas Malmberga, Lars Rydéna, Per Tornvalla, Ulf Stenestrandb and Lars Wallentinc For the Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care, Admissions (RIKS-HIA)

a Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
b Department of Cardiology, the University Hospital in Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
c Department of Cardiology, the University Hospital in Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46-8-517-72171; fax: +46-8- 31-10-44
E-mail address: anna.norhammar{at}ks.se

Received 8 November 2002; accepted 20 November 2002

Aims The prognosis after an acute myocardial infarction is worse for patients with diabetes mellitus than for those without. We investigated whether differences in the use of evidence-based treatment may contribute to the differences in 1-year survival in a large cohort of consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Methods We included patients below the age of 80 years from the Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive care Admissions (RIKS-HIA), which included all patients admitted to coronary care units at 58 hospitals during 1995–1998. In all 5193 patients had the combination of acute myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus while 20 440 had myocardial infarction but no diabetes diagnosed. Multivariate logistical regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of diabetes mellitus on the use of evidence-based treatment and its association with survival during the first year after the index hospitalisation.

Results The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 20.3% (males 18.5%; females 24.4%). The 1-year mortality was substantially higher among diabetic patients compared with those without diabetes mellitus (13.0 vs. 22.3% for males and 14.4 vs. 26.1% for female patients, respectively) with an odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) in three different age groups: <65 years 2.65 (2.23–3.16); 65–74 years 1.81 (1.61–2.04) and >75 years 1.71 (1.50–1.93). During hospital stay patients with diabetes mellitus received significantly less treatment with heparins (37 vs. 43%; ), intravenous beta blockade (29 vs. 33%; ), thrombolysis (31 vs. 41%; ) and acute revascularisation (4 vs. 5%; ). A similar pattern was apparent at hospital discharge. After multiple adjustments for dissimilarities in baseline characteristics between the two groups, patients with diabetes were significantly less likely to be treated with reperfusion therapy (OR 0.83), heparins (OR 0.88), statins (OR 0.88) or to be revascularised within 14 days from hospital discharge procedures (OR 0.86) while the use of ACE-inhibitors was more prevalent among diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients (OR 1.45). The mortality reducing effects of evidence-based treatment like reperfusion, heparins, aspirin, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering treatment and revascularisation were, in multivariate analyses, of equal benefit in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Interpretation Diabetes mellitus continues to be a major independent predictor of 1-year mortality following an acute myocardial infarction, especially in younger age groups. This may partly be explained by less use of evidence-based treatment although treatment benefits are similar in both patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Thus a more extensive use of established treatment has a potential to improve the poor prognosis among patients with acute myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus.

Key Words: Acute myocardialinfarction • diabetes mellitus • prognosis • evidence-based treatment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
A. C. Dale, L. J Vatten, T. I. Nilsen, K. Midthjell, and R. Wiseth
Secular decline in mortality from coronary heart disease in adults with diabetes mellitus: cohort study
BMJ, August 13, 2008; 337(jul01_2): a236 - a236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A. Norhammar, J. Lindback, L. Ryden, L. Wallentin, U. Stenestrand, and on behalf of the Register of Information and Knowl
Improved but still high short- and long-term mortality rates after myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus: a time-trend report from the Swedish Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admission
Heart, December 1, 2007; 93(12): 1577 - 1583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Wallander, A. Norhammar, K. Malmberg, J. Ohrvik, L. Ryden, and K. Brismar
IGF Binding Protein 1 Predicts Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2007; 30(9): 2343 - 2348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, J.-P. Bassand, C. W. Hamm, D. Ardissino, E. Boersma, A. Budaj, F. Fernandez-Aviles, K. A.A. Fox, D. Hasdai, E. M. Ohman, et al.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2007; 28(13): 1598 - 1660.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, L. Ryden, E. Standl, M. Bartnik, G. V. d. Berghe, J. Betteridge, M.-J. de Boer, F. Cosentino, B. Jonsson, M. Laakso, et al.
Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: full text: The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2007; 9(suppl_C): C3 - C74.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Dotevall, A. Rosengren, M. Bartnik, K. Malmberg, J. Ohrvik, M. Simoons, L. Ryden, and on behalf of the Euro Heart Survey Investigators
Sex-related aspects on abnormal glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2007; 28(3): 310 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, L. Ryden, E. Standl, M. Bartnik, G. Van den Berghe, J. Betteridge, M.-J. de Boer, F. Cosentino, B. Jonsson, M. Laakso, et al.
Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: executive summary: The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 88 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
G. L. Booth, M. K. Kapral, K. Fung, and J. V. Tu
Recent Trends in Cardiovascular Complications Among Men and Women With and Without Diabetes
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2006; 29(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. Malmberg, L. Ryden, H. Wedel, K. Birkeland, A. Bootsma, K. Dickstein, S. Efendic, M. Fisher, A. Hamsten, J. Herlitz, et al.
Intense metabolic control by means of insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI 2): effects on mortality and morbidity
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 650 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Bartnik, K. Malmberg, A. Norhammar, A. Tenerz, J. Ohrvik, and L. Ryden
Newly detected abnormal glucose tolerance: an important predictor of long-term outcome after myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2004; 25(22): 1990 - 1997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Bartnik, L. Ryden, R. Ferrari, K. Malmberg, K. Pyorala, M. Simoons, E. Standl, J. Soler-Soler, J. Ohrvik, and on behalf of the Euro Heart Survey Investigators
The prevalence of abnormal glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease across Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on diabetes and the heart
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1880 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
E Kvan, A Reikvam, and INPHAR Study Investigators
Thrombolytic treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction: lower rates of use than in non-diabetic patients are explained by differences in presenting ECGs
Heart, November 1, 2004; 90(11): 1346 - 1347.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Norhammar, K. Malmberg, E. Diderholm, B. Lagerqvist, B. Lindahl, L. Ryden, and L. Wallentin
Diabetes mellitus: the major risk factor in unstable coronary artery disease even after consideration of the extent of coronary artery disease and benefits of revascularization
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 585 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
O. Schnell, O. Schafer, S. Kleybrink, W. Doering, E. Standl, and W. Otter
Intensification of Therapeutic Approaches Reduces Mortality in Diabetic Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Munich registry
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 455 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.