Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2004 25(11):902-919; doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.03.023
Copyright © 2004 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (63)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walley, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walley, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Review

Drug-eluting stents: an early systematic review to inform policy

Ruaraidh A. Hilla,*, Yenal Dündara, Ameet Bakhaib,1, Rumona Dicksona and Tom Walleya

a Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, The Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
b Cardiology Department, Barnet General Hospital, Wellhouse Lane, Barnet EN5 3DJ, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-151-794-5541; fax: +44-151-794-5477
E-mail address: rahill{at}liv.ac.uk

Received 15 December 2003; revised 9 March 2004; accepted 18 March 2004 See page 895 for the editorial comment on this review2.

Abstract

Aims To provide systematic assessment of the clinical effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus non-DES to inform national guidance.

Methods and results The review was conducted according to internationally recognised methods. The search strategy identified published (7) and unpublished (7) randomised controlled trials comparing the use of DES to non-DES. Outcomes included death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), revascularisation, event rate (composite of adverse events), and binary restenosis. Data synthesis included descriptive statistics and meta-analysis. Fourteen randomised clinical trials comparing DES to non-DES and involving 5747 patients were identified.

There were reductions in event rates between DES and non-DES; odds ratio (OR) 0.63 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.47, 0.84, ) for paclitaxel-eluting stents at 12 months, OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.22, 0.42, ) for sirolimus-eluting stents at 12 months. Combined event rates were inconsistently defined across trials and were primarily composed of revascularisations, possibly driven by protocol-required angiograms. DES reduced binary restenosis rates at angiogram compared to non-DES. No significant differences in rates of death or AMI were identified.

Conclusion The early data available indicate that DES reduce adverse cardiac events, mainly revascularisations. However, these data are limited in terms of patient numbers, length of follow-up, and method of outcome assessment. The evaluation of rapidly evolving technologies requires the inclusion of data not routinely considered for inclusion in systematic reviews of effectiveness.

Key Words: Drug-eluting stents • Stents • Interventional cardiology • Systematic review • Health technology assessment • Policy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Drug-eluting stents: the new gold standard for percutaneous coronary revascularisation
Antonio Colombo and Ioannis Iakovou
EHJ 2004 25: 895-897. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. T. Newsome, M. A. Kutcher, and R. L. Royster
Coronary Artery Stents: Part I. Evolution of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 552 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. L. Pinto Slottow and R. Waksman
Overview of the 2007 Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting on the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent
Circulation, March 25, 2008; 117(12): 1603 - 1608.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Ortolani, M. Balducelli, P. Marzaroli, G. Piovaccari, A. Menozzi, V. Guiducci, P. Sangiorgio, F. Tarantino, G. Geraci, F. Castriota, et al.
Two-Year Clinical Outcomes With Drug-Eluting Stents for Diabetic Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions: Results From a Real-World Multicenter Registry
Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 923 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
U. Zeymer and R. Zahn
Drug-eluting stents: effective and safe for every patient and every lesion?
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2559 - 2560.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. J. Kereiakes
Does Clopidogrel Each Day Keep Stent Thrombosis Away?
JAMA, January 10, 2007; 297(2): 209 - 211.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. P. Taggart
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Still the Best Treatment for Multivessel and Left Main Disease, But Patients Need to Know
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 1966 - 1975.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. J. Nordmann, M. Briel, and H. C. Bucher
Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2006; 27(23): 2784 - 2814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. K. Smith, R. M. Califf, R. H. Tuttle, L. K. Shaw, K. L. Lee, E. R. Delong, R. E. Lilly, M. H. Sketch Jr, E. D. Peterson, and R. H. Jones
Selection of surgical or percutaneous coronary intervention provides differential longevity benefit.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1420 - 1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. Breeman, M. E. Bertrand, J. P. Ottervanger, S. Hoeks, M. Lenzen, U. Sechtem, V. Legrand, M.-J. de Boer, W. Wijns, E. Boersma, et al.
Diabetes does not influence treatment decisions regarding revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2006; 29(9): 2003 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Blindt, F. Vogt, I. Astafieva, C. Fach, M. Hristov, N. Krott, B. Seitz, A. Kapurniotu, C. Kwok, M. Dewor, et al.
A Novel Drug-Eluting Stent Coated With an Integrin-Binding Cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp Peptide Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia by Recruiting Endothelial Progenitor Cells
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1786 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Stettler, S Allemann, M Egger, S Windecker, B Meier, and P Diem
Efficacy of drug eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: indirect comparison of controlled trials
Heart, May 1, 2006; 92(5): 650 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. G. Raja
Drug-Eluting Stents and the Future of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Facts and Fiction.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 1162 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, P. Agostoni, G. M. Sangiorgi, F. Airoldi, J. Cosgrave, A. Chieffo, R. Barbagallo, C. Tamburino, G. Vittori, E. Falchetti, et al.
Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of coronary dissections left untreated after drug-eluting stent implantation
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2006; 27(5): 540 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. G L Biondi-Zoccai, M. Lotrionte, A. Abbate, L. Testa, E. Remigi, F. Burzotta, M. Valgimigli, E. Romagnoli, F. Crea, and P. Agostoni
Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study
BMJ, January 28, 2006; 332(7535): 202 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
U Dietz, N Holz, C Dauer, and H Lambertz
Shortening the stent length reduces restenosis with bare metal stents: matched pair comparison of short stenting and conventional stenting
Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 80 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Bagust, A D Grayson, N D Palmer, R A Perry, and T Walley
Cost effectiveness of drug eluting coronary artery stenting in a UK setting: cost-utility study
Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 68 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A. M Franks and S. F Gardner
AGI-1067: A Novel Vascular Protectant for Prevention of Restenosis
Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 66 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. M. Califf
Stenting or Surgery: An Opportunity to Do it Right
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 589 - 591.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. A. Bavry, D. J. Kumbhani, T. J. Helton, and D. L. Bhatt
What is the risk of stent thrombosis associated with the use of paclitaxel-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention?: A meta-analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2005; 45(6): 941 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. J. Scheen, F. Warzee, and V. M.G. Legrand
Drug-eluting stents: meta-analysis in diabetic patients
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2167 - 2168.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Bagust, A. Bakhai, R. Dickson, Y. Dundar, R. A Hill, and T. Walley
Exploring groups at high risk of restenosis
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2168 - 2169.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, September 11, 2004; 329(7466): E323 - E323.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Eriksson
Long-term clopidogrel therapy in the drug eluting stent era: beyond CREDO and CURE-PCI: Reply
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1364 - 1365.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, July 10, 2004; 329(7457): 120 - 120.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.