Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2004 25(11):932-942; doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.005
Copyright © 2004 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Celutkiene, J.
Right arrow Articles by Grabauskiene, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Celutkiene, J.
Right arrow Articles by Grabauskiene, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Clinical research

Is post-systolic motion the optimal ultrasound parameter to detect induced ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography?

Jelena Celutkienea,*, George R Sutherlandb, Aleksandras Lauceviciusa, Diana Zakarkaitea, Alfredas Rudysa and Virginija Grabauskienea

a Cardiovascular Centre, Vilnius University Hospital, Santariskiu Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
b Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +370-5-2365207; fax: +370-5-2365211
E-mail address: jelena.celutkiene{at}santa.lt

Received 14 July 2003; revised 12 March 2004; accepted 2 April 2004 This paper was guest edited by Dr Michael H. Picard, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA

Abstract

Aims Doppler myocardial imaging (DMI) has been suggested as a method of quantifying induced ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). The aim of the present study was to investigate both standard systolic and diastolic parameters, but more specifically to address the phenomenon of post-systolic motion (PSM) as a marker of acquired ischaemia during DSE using pulsed-wave DMI.

Methods and results We examined 60 patients without previous myocardial infarction who underwent DSE. Peak systolic, post-systolic, early and late diastolic velocities were measured at rest and during stress. Myocardial segments () were divided into ISCHAEMIC and NON-ISCHAEMIC groups according to the presence of significant angiographic coronary stenosis. ISCHAEMIC segments () compared with NON-ISCHAEMIC segments () demonstrated a reduced increase of systolic velocity (8.0–12.7 vs 9.3–16.4 cm/s, ), prominent PSM (5.8–8.3 vs 0.63–2.1 cm/s, ) and reduced early diastolic velocity (6.5–10.2 vs 7.9–13.2 cm/s, ) during stress. The peak velocity of PSM was the most accurate index of induced ischaemia (sensitivity 73–100%, specificity 82–97%) compared to systolic and early diastolic velocities (sensitivity 52–77% and 63–68%, specificity 63–77% and 59–81%, respectively).

Conclusion PSM derived by pulsed-wave DMI during DSE was the most sensitive index of acquired ischaemia compared to other functional DMI indices.

Key Words: Doppler myocardial imaging • Dobutamine stress echocardiography • Regional myocardial function • Induced ischaemia • Post-systolic motion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. P. Abraham, V. L. Dimaano, and H.-Y. Liang
Role of Tissue Doppler and Strain Echocardiography in Current Clinical Practice
Circulation, November 27, 2007; 116(22): 2597 - 2609.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Merli and G. R. Sutherland
Can we quantify ischaemia during Dobutamine stress echocardiography in clinical practice?
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2004; 25(17): 1477 - 1479.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.